From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756775Ab3CDKWE (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 05:22:04 -0500 Received: from slimlogic.co.uk ([89.16.172.20]:51702 "EHLO slimlogic.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756214Ab3CDKWC (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 05:22:02 -0500 Message-ID: <5134758A.8010204@slimlogic.co.uk> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:20:58 +0000 From: Ian Lartey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely CC: Laxman Dewangan , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" , Graeme Gregory Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: palmas: add in GPIO support for palmas charger References: <1362157598-11458-1-git-send-email-ian@slimlogic.co.uk> <5131ACC3.10803@nvidia.com> <20130302193500.783693E1095@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20130302193500.783693E1095@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/03/13 19:35, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 13:09:47 +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >> On Friday 01 March 2013 10:36 PM, Ian Lartey wrote: >>> Palmas charger has 16 GPIOs >>> add palmas_gpio_[read|write|update] api to take account >>> second bank of GPIOs >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey >>> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory >>> --- >> >> Looks good. >> Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan >> > > Applied for v3.10, thanks. > > g. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Hello Grant, For this [v2] patch I missed out that this patch depends on "[PATCH v2] mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers." I did have this noted in the first version of this patch - sorry. kbuild rightly complained about the patch Do you want to revert this patch until the "mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers" is also accepted ? Ian