From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936559Ab3DJNMb (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:12:31 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:33530 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935841Ab3DJNM3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:12:29 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,447,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="320291819" Message-ID: <51656534.6030902@intel.com> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:12:20 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Shi , peterz@infradead.org CC: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, jkosina@suse.cz, clark.williams@gmail.com, tony.luck@intel.com, keescook@chromium.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch v3 0/8] sched: use runnable avg in load balance References: <1364873008-3169-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <5163A25F.5080909@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5163A25F.5080909@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/09/2013 01:08 PM, Alex Shi wrote: > On 04/02/2013 11:23 AM, Alex Shi wrote: >> > This version resolved the aim7 liked benchmark issue by patch 8th. >> > Thanks for MikeG's avg_idle that is a good bursty wakeup indicator. >> > >> > The first 3 patches were also include in my power aware scheduling patchset. >> > >> > Morten, you can rebase your patch on this new version that bases on latest >> > Linus tree. :) >> > >> > a git tree for this patchset: >> > https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling.git runnablelb > I removed the 3rd and 8th patches, left 1,2,4,5,6,7. and updated them in > above git tree. > > I tested the kbuild, specjbb2005, aim9, fileio-cfq, hackbench and > dbench. on my NHM EP and 2 sockets SNB EP box. hackbench increased 3~5% > on both machines. kbuild has suspicious 2% increase. others has no clear > change. This patchset has tested by ARM guys and Michael. None of regression found. Peter, could you like to give some comments? -- Thanks Alex