From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966308Ab3DQMON (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:14:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17255 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966134Ab3DQMOM (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:14:12 -0400 Message-ID: <516E9205.3070200@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:13:57 +0800 From: Lingzhu Xiang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Whitcroft CC: Luis Henriques , Matt Fleming , Josh Boyer , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Lee, Chun-Yi" , "kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com" , Seiji Aguchi , Michael Schroeder Subject: Re: [PATCH 097/102] efivars: explicitly calculate length of VariableName References: <1365414657-29191-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> <1365414657-29191-98-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> <1365547506.5814.36.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <51653E81.4090102@redhat.com> <20130410121730.GB3049@hercules> <20130411091256.GA11370@hercules> <20130416103321.GB3054@hercules> <516E2717.3020309@redhat.com> <20130417115641.GG15755@dm> In-Reply-To: <20130417115641.GG15755@dm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/17/2013 07:56 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:37:43PM +0800, Lingzhu Xiang wrote: >> On 04/16/2013 06:33 PM, Luis Henriques wrote: >>> 68d929862e29a8b52a7f2f2f86a0600423b093cd efi: be more paranoid about available space when creating variables >> >> This prevents a bricking issue for some Samsung devices but causes >> regression on many other machines. >> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55471 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947142 >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/1078 >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/47150 >> >> This patchset will fix it again: >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/1081 > > Thanks for the pointer. I note that in that thread you yourself imply > there are still issues after applying them? Was that accurate, is there > yet further patches needed? I just find that issue. Didn't see that when writing the above. Earlier I was testing on a different machine and the result was good. I guess the patch still needs some more testing. Lingzhu