From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966804Ab3DROcb (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:32:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f179.google.com ([209.85.215.179]:42697 "EHLO mail-ea0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965654Ab3DROca (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:32:30 -0400 Message-ID: <517003FA.4000509@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:32:26 +0200 From: Daniel Lezcano User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Ferre CC: Arnd Bergmann , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Victor , Albin Tonnerre Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: at91: suspend both memory controllers on at91sam9263 References: <1359123276-15833-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1359153858-31992-19-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <516FF8FC.7070901@atmel.com> <201304181615.20542.arnd@arndb.de> <51700105.9080802@atmel.com> In-Reply-To: <51700105.9080802@atmel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/18/2013 04:19 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 04/18/2013 04:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann : >> On Thursday 18 April 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> >>>> This patch blindly removes the warning and changes the >>>> at91sam9263 to use the same code at at91sam9g45, which >>>> may or may not be the right solution. If it is not, >>>> maybe someone could provide a better fix. >>> >>> Maybe you can remove this paragraph: now you are using the proper fix >>> with proper RAM type. >>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >>>> Cc: Nicolas Ferre >>> >>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre >>> >>> What is the future of this patch series: do you want us to take this >>> patch separately or to you want to apply the whole series on the arm-soc >>> tree? >> >> I'd prefer if you could just apply or forward it to an appropriate tree. >> >> Most of the other patches have found their way into mainline by now. >> >>>> Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard >>>> Cc: Andrew Victor >>>> Cc: Albin Tonnerre >>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano >>> >>> Moreover, this patch my conflict with Daniel's current initiative to >>> move cpuidle driver to its own directory: how do we coordinate with each >>> other? >> >> Maybe you can make sure it actually works and send it to Daniel to apply on >> top of his other patches? > > Well, as Daniel's patches are still under construction, I stack this one > on the at91-3.10-soc branch and let Daniel rebase his work on top of a > 3.10-rc1-ish tree... No problem. Thanks -- Daniel -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog