From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19A1C432C0 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 03:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF94D206CC for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 03:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726539AbfKRDPt (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:15:49 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:6241 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726201AbfKRDPs (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:15:48 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B8A8CBE601950308EB5E; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:15:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.173.222.12) by DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:15:39 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] vrf: Fix possible NULL pointer oops when delete nic To: David Ahern , , , CC: , , , References: <60e827cb-2bba-2b7e-55dc-651103e9905f@huawei.com> From: "wangxiaogang (F)" Message-ID: <517baa2a-2c42-7790-e225-02d22c5ed90b@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:15:38 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.173.222.12] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/11/15 21:14, David Ahern wrote: > On 11/14/19 11:22 PM, wangxiaogang (F) wrote: >> From: XiaoGang Wang >> >> Recently we get a crash when access illegal address (0xc0), >> which will occasionally appear when deleting a physical NIC with vrf. >> > > How long have you been running this test? > > I am wondering if this is fallout from the recent adjacency changes in > commits 5343da4c1742 through f3b0a18bb6cb. > > > > > Thank you so much for the reply, our kernel version is linux 4.19. this problem happened once in our production environment.