From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, dianders@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:06:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519d4a00-a251-3437-6c3e-6ee3e75bf64c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e9da41e-4e3a-7098-bece-7f6cba89a2aa@huawei.com>
On 2021-07-26 09:13, John Garry wrote:
> On 21/07/2021 19:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> First off, yes, this conflicts with just about everything else
>> currently in-flight. Sorry about that. If it stands up to initial review
>> then I'll start giving some thought to how to fit everything together
>> (particularly John's cleanup of strictness defaults, which I'd be
>> inclined to fold into a v2 of this series).
>
> It seems to me that patch #20 is the only real conflict, and that is
> just a different form of mine in that passthrough, strict, and lazy are
> under a single choice, as opposed to passthrough being a separate config
> (for mine). And on that point, I did assume that we would have a
> different sysfs file for strict vs lazy in this series, and not a new
> domain type. But I assume that there is a good reason for that.
Yes, as mentioned by patch #18 it helps a surprising number of things
fall into place really neatly.
> Anyway, I'd really like to see my series just merged now.
Sure, I was going to say I can happily rebase on top of your series
as-is if Joerg wants to apply it first, and now that's just happened :)
Cheers,
Robin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-26 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-21 18:20 [PATCH 00/23] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 01/23] iommu: Pull IOVA cookie management into the core Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 02/23] iommu/amd: Drop IOVA cookie management Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 03/23] iommu/arm-smmu: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 04/23] iommu/vt-d: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 05/23] iommu/exynos: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 06/23] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 07/23] iommu/mtk: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 08/23] iommu/rockchip: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 09/23] iommu/sprd: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 10/23] iommu/sun50i: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 11/23] iommu/virtio: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 12/23] iommu/dma: Unexport " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 13/23] iommu/dma: Remove redundant "!dev" checks Robin Murphy
2021-07-26 8:28 ` John Garry
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 14/23] iommu: Introduce explicit type for non-strict DMA domains Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 15/23] iommu/amd: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 16/23] iommu/arm-smmu: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-26 12:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-26 13:09 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-26 18:43 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 17/23] iommu/vt-d: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-22 16:44 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22 17:30 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-22 18:44 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24 5:23 ` Lu Baolu
2021-07-26 8:30 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 18/23] iommu: Express DMA strictness via the domain type Robin Murphy
2021-07-24 5:29 ` Lu Baolu
2021-07-26 8:27 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-26 11:31 ` Lu Baolu
2021-07-26 12:29 ` Lu Baolu
2021-07-26 12:43 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 19/23] iommu: Expose DMA domain strictness via sysfs Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 20/23] iommu: Allow choosing DMA strictness at build time Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 21/23] iommu/dma: Factor out flush queue init Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 22/23] iommu: Allow enabling non-strict mode dynamically Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 23/23] iommu/arm-smmu: Allow non-strict in pgtable_quirks interface Robin Murphy
2021-07-26 8:13 ` [PATCH 00/23] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness John Garry
2021-07-26 12:06 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2021-07-26 13:02 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519d4a00-a251-3437-6c3e-6ee3e75bf64c@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).