From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752126Ab3FQQXG (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:23:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com ([209.85.192.176]:54888 "EHLO mail-pd0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751174Ab3FQQXE (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:23:04 -0400 Message-ID: <51BF37E4.8020006@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:23:00 -0700 From: John Stultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baruch Siach CC: Will Deacon , Russell King , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Boyd , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "arm@kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly References: <1370155183-31421-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <51AD32A4.5070609@linaro.org> <20130604160907.GW27516@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <51AE2980.6010005@linaro.org> <20130616094501.GG10269@tarshish> In-Reply-To: <20130616094501.GG10269@tarshish> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/16/2013 02:45 AM, Baruch Siach wrote: > Hi John, > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:53:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: >> On 06/04/2013 09:09 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:19:48AM +0100, John Stultz wrote: >>>> On 06/01/2013 11:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>>>> This is mostly a resend of a patch series I sent a little over a month >>>>> ago. I've reordered the patches so that John can pick up the first three >>>>> and get a generic sched_clock layer without having to take the 64 bit >>>>> patches. The last three patches add 64 bit support and move the architected >>>>> timers on ARM64 and ARM to use it. >>>> Yea, so from the initial look over it, I think I'm happy with queuing >>>> the first three patches, although I'd like to get some acks from arm >>>> folks on at least the first two, just so no one is surprised with it >>>> going through the -tip tree. >>> The first two patches are pretty simple so, FWIW, you can add my ack on those: >>> >>> Acked-by: Will Deacon >> Thanks! Added to the commits. > What is the status of this series then? Is there a chance of seeing it in > 3.11? I want to base some xtensa architecture work on this, so I'd like to > know whether there is a stable base to start from. I've got the first three in my internal tree, and was going to send it by Thomas for 3.11 this week. Thanks for the ping! -john