linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Stephen Warren" <swarren@nvidia.com>, � <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Anmar Oueja" <anmar.oueja@linaro.org>,
	"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: establish pull-up/pull-down terminology
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:06:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C4A447.3090807@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C2F7BE.2060805@imgtec.com>

On 06/20/2013 06:38 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> On 19/06/13 23:03, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/16/2013 04:45 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> It is counter-intuitive to have "0" mean disable in a boolean
>>> manner for electronic properties of pins such as pull-up and
>>> pull-down. Therefore, define that a pull-up/pull-down argument
>>> of 0 to such a generic option means that the pin is
>>> short-circuited to VDD or GROUND. Pull disablement shall be
>>> done using PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE.
>>>
>>> Cc: Heiko St�bner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
>>> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h | 13 +++++++------
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h
>>> index d414a77..67780f5 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h
>>> @@ -36,14 +36,15 @@
>>>   *	tristate. The argument is ignored.
>>>   * @PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP: the pin will be pulled up (usually with high
>>>   *	impedance to VDD). If the argument is != 0 pull-up is enabled,
>>> - *	if it is 0, pull-up is disabled.
>>> + *	if it is 0, pull-up it total, i.e. the pin is connected to VDD.
>>>   * @PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN: the pin will be pulled down (usually with high
>>>   *	impedance to GROUND). If the argument is != 0 pull-down is enabled,
>>> - *	if it is 0, pull-down is disabled.
>>> + *	if it is 0, pull-down is total, i.e. the pin is connected to GROUND.
>>>   * @PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT: the pin will be pulled up or down based
>>>   *	on embedded knowledge of the controller, like current mux function.
>>> - *	If the argument is != 0 pull up/down is enabled, if it is 0,
>>> - *	the pull is disabled.
>>> + *	If the argument is != 0 pull up/down is enabled, if it is 0, the
>>> + *	configuration is ignored. The proper way to disable it is to use
>>> + *	@PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE.
>>
>> Why treat PULL_UP/PULL_DOWN differently from PULL_PIN_DEFAULT?
>> PULL_PIN_DEFAULT is logically simply a macro that selects PULL_UP/DOWN
>> based on what's "normal" for the pin's expected usage, so surely the
>> value associated with that option should behave identically?
> 
> I'm not familiar with hardware that does this so I could be way wrong
> here, but presumably if there's a default up/down, there's probably a
> default resistance too. Does it really make sense to say
> "pull up or down depending on whatever the pin is intended for... but
> whichever it is must be XXX Ohm"?
> If you know the resistance you want, you surely already know whether you
> want it pull up or down with that resistence.

IIRC the idea of the PULL_PIN_DEFAULT was to avoid having to specify
UP/DOWN for each pin/group, but could just say "default", which would
then reduce the number of pinctrl mapping table entries or pinctrl DT
property entries. I don't think this would have any interaction with
setting the resistance; it's entirely plausible that you'd want the same
explicit, or same default, resistance, for all pins, irrespective of
pull-up vs. down.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-21 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-16 10:45 [PATCH] pinctrl: establish pull-up/pull-down terminology Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 14:39 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-17  2:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17  4:38 ` Tony Prisk
     [not found] ` <20926.42315.907448.451620@ipc1.ka-ro>
2013-06-17 15:51   ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-19 22:03 ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-20 12:38   ` James Hogan
2013-06-21 19:06     ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-06-21 23:30       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-21 23:39         ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-24 12:24           ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-24 12:39             ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-24 18:04         ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C4A447.3090807@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=anmar.oueja@linaro.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).