From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
aswin@hp.com, scott.norton@hp.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com,
Peter Portante <pportant@redhat.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: Limit idle_balance() when it is being used too frequently
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:27:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E59EA0.6060209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374002463.3944.11.camel@j-VirtualBox>
On 07/16/2013 03:21 PM, Jason Low wrote:
> When running benchmarks on an 8 socket 80 core machine with a 3.10 kernel,
> there can be a lot of contention in idle_balance() and related functions.
> On many AIM7 workloads in which CPUs go idle very often and idle balance
> gets called a lot, it is actually lowering performance.
>
> Since idle balance often helps performance (when it is not overused), I
> looked into trying to avoid attempting idle balance only when it is
> occurring too frequently.
>
> This RFC patch attempts to keep track of the approximate "average" time between
> idle balance attempts per CPU. Each time the idle_balance() function is
> invoked, it will compute the duration since the last idle_balance() for
> the current CPU. The avg time between idle balance attempts is then updated
> using a very similar method as how rq->avg_idle is computed.
>
> Once the average time between idle balance attempts drops below a certain
> value (which in this patch is sysctl_sched_idle_balance_limit), idle_balance
> for that CPU will be skipped. The average time between idle balances will
> continue to be updated, even if it ends up getting skipped. The
> initial/maximum average is set a lot higher though to make sure that the
> avg doesn't fall below the threshold until the sample size is large and to
> prevent the avg from being overestimated.
>
> This change improved the performance of many AIM7 workloads at 1, 2, 4, 8
> sockets on the 3.10 kernel. The most significant differences were at
> 8 sockets HT-enabled. The table below compares the average jobs per minute
> at 1100-2000 users between the vanilla 3.10 kernel and 3.10 kernel with this
> patch. I included data for both hyperthreading disabled and enabled. I used
> numactl to restrict AIM7 to run on certain number of nodes. I only included
> data in which the % difference was beyond a 2% noise range.
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
--
All rights reversed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-16 19:21 [RFC] sched: Limit idle_balance() when it is being used too frequently Jason Low
2013-07-16 19:27 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2013-07-16 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-16 22:48 ` Jason Low
2013-07-17 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-17 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-17 8:11 ` Jason Low
2013-07-17 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-17 15:59 ` Jason Low
2013-07-17 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-17 17:51 ` Rik van Riel
2013-07-17 18:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-17 18:48 ` Jason Low
2013-07-18 4:02 ` Jason Low
2013-07-18 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-18 11:59 ` Rik van Riel
2013-07-18 12:15 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-18 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-18 13:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-18 19:06 ` Jason Low
2013-07-19 18:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-19 19:15 ` Jason Low
2013-07-18 12:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-18 19:03 ` Jason Low
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E59EA0.6060209@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=pportant@redhat.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).