From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751839Ab3JECHg (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 22:07:36 -0400 Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:65523 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751196Ab3JECHe (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 22:07:34 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 108.223.40.66 Message-ID: <524F7461.4010703@roeck-us.net> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 19:07:29 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olof Johansson CC: Mark Brown , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , Thierry Reding , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 3 References: <20131004010230.GI27287@sirena.org.uk> <524E50DB.3060707@roeck-us.net> <524EC658.90706@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/04/2013 10:04 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 10/03/2013 10:41 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> >>>> On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the >>>>> master branch of the repository below: >>>>> >>>>> git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git >>>>> >>>>> A next-20131003 tag is also provided for convenience. >>>>> >>>>> A few new conflicts today caused by the removal of the h8300 >>>>> architecture which I didn't report for triviality. Several new build >>>>> failures were found as a result of running allmodconfig tests between >>>>> merges all of which have been reported and I'm still carrying the i.MX >>>>> fix that Thierry has been carrying. >>>>> >>>>> Due to the length of time taken to run all the allmodconfigs I skipped >>>>> the defconfig tests; I know Olof has the ARM stuff covered in his >>>>> autobuilder. I'm going to use allyesconfig tomorrow since that should >>>>> run faster so hopefully I can cover the ARM, i386 and x86_64 configs >>>>> again. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I could try to set up the buildbot farm I am using for -stable candidates >>>> to also test the -next tree. Would that help ? >>> >>> >>> ARM is pretty well-covered by my builds, I post results at: >>> >>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-build-reports >>> >> >> Great summaries. Do you have a single builder, or several builders and >> collect the results ? Either case, any chance sharing the buildbot scripts ? > > My buildbot scripts are some pretty ugly hacks that I don't > particularly feel like publishing to the world. I can send you a copy > though. > Not much different to the quality of mine :). Would be great if you can send me a copy. For my scripts, I still have some secrets in there like my gmail password in the clear. I'll have to make sure it is removed before I can publish it. > The builder is one single beefy machine that i have on loan. It > wouldn't be hard to make it distributed instead though; I've toyed > around with prototypes for that in the past. > I would love to have something like that .. mine essentially consists of four PCs with quad-core CPUs, plus two smaller systems which are not always online. Thanks, Guenter