linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Steve French" <smfrench@gmail.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, swhiteho@redhat.com,
	sfrench@samba.org, vandrove@vc.cvut.cz,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [8/18] BKL-removal: Remove BKL from remote_llseek
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:57:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <524f69650801270857i6610e736q4189dc6af9b22360@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080127021714.A223614D2E@wotan.suse.de>

Don't you need to a spinlock/spinunlock(i_lock) or something similar
(there isn't a spinlock in the file struct unfortunately) around the
reads and writes from f_pos in fs/read_write.c in remote_llseek with
your patch since the reads/writes from that field are not necessarily
atomic and threads could be racing in seek on the same file struct?

On Jan 26, 2008 8:17 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> - Replace remote_llseek with remote_llseek_unlocked (to force compilation
> failures in all users)
> - Change all users to either use remote_llseek directly or take the
> BKL around. I changed the file systems who don't use the BKL
> for anything (CIFS, GFS) to call it directly. NCPFS and SMBFS and NFS
> take the BKL, but explicitely in their own source now.
>
> I moved them all over in a single patch to avoid unbisectable sections.
>
> Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
> Cc: swhiteho@redhat.com
> Cc: sfrench@samba.org
> Cc: vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifsfs.c   |    2 +-
>  fs/gfs2/ops_file.c |    4 ++--
>  fs/ncpfs/file.c    |   12 +++++++++++-
>  fs/nfs/file.c      |    6 +++++-
>  fs/read_write.c    |    7 +++----
>  fs/smbfs/file.c    |   11 ++++++++++-
>  include/linux/fs.h |    3 ++-
>  7 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> +++ linux/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static loff_t cifs_llseek(struct file *f
>                 if (retval < 0)
>                         return (loff_t)retval;
>         }
> -       return remote_llseek(file, offset, origin);
> +       return remote_llseek_unlocked(file, offset, origin);
>  }
>
>  static struct file_system_type cifs_fs_type = {
> Index: linux/fs/gfs2/ops_file.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/gfs2/ops_file.c
> +++ linux/fs/gfs2/ops_file.c
> @@ -107,11 +107,11 @@ static loff_t gfs2_llseek(struct file *f
>                 error = gfs2_glock_nq_init(ip->i_gl, LM_ST_SHARED, LM_FLAG_ANY,
>                                            &i_gh);
>                 if (!error) {
> -                       error = remote_llseek(file, offset, origin);
> +                       error = remote_llseek_unlocked(file, offset, origin);
>                         gfs2_glock_dq_uninit(&i_gh);
>                 }
>         } else
> -               error = remote_llseek(file, offset, origin);
> +               error = remote_llseek_unlocked(file, offset, origin);
>
>         return error;
>  }
> Index: linux/fs/ncpfs/file.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/ncpfs/file.c
> +++ linux/fs/ncpfs/file.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
>
>  #include <linux/ncp_fs.h>
>  #include "ncplib_kernel.h"
> @@ -281,9 +282,18 @@ static int ncp_release(struct inode *ino
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static loff_t ncp_remote_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
> +{
> +       loff_t ret;
> +       lock_kernel();
> +       ret = remote_llseek_unlocked(file, offset, origin);
> +       unlock_kernel();
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
>  const struct file_operations ncp_file_operations =
>  {
> -       .llseek         = remote_llseek,
> +       .llseek         = ncp_remote_llseek,
>         .read           = ncp_file_read,
>         .write          = ncp_file_write,
>         .ioctl          = ncp_ioctl,
> Index: linux/fs/read_write.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/read_write.c
> +++ linux/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -58,11 +58,10 @@ loff_t generic_file_llseek(struct file *
>
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_file_llseek);
>
> -loff_t remote_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
> +loff_t remote_llseek_unlocked(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  {
>         long long retval;
>
> -       lock_kernel();
>         switch (origin) {
>                 case SEEK_END:
>                         offset += i_size_read(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
> @@ -73,15 +72,15 @@ loff_t remote_llseek(struct file *file,
>         retval = -EINVAL;
>         if (offset>=0 && offset<=file->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) {
>                 if (offset != file->f_pos) {
> +                       /* AK: do we need a lock for those? */
>                         file->f_pos = offset;
>                         file->f_version = 0;
>                 }
>                 retval = offset;
>         }
> -       unlock_kernel();
>         return retval;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(remote_llseek);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(remote_llseek_unlocked);
>
>  loff_t no_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  {
> Index: linux/fs/smbfs/file.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/smbfs/file.c
> +++ linux/fs/smbfs/file.c
> @@ -422,9 +422,18 @@ smb_file_permission(struct inode *inode,
>         return error;
>  }
>
> +static loff_t smb_remote_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
> +{
> +       loff_t ret;
> +       lock_kernel();
> +       ret = remote_llseek_unlocked(file, offset, origin);
> +       unlock_kernel();
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
>  const struct file_operations smb_file_operations =
>  {
> -       .llseek         = remote_llseek,
> +       .llseek         = smb_remote_llseek,
>         .read           = do_sync_read,
>         .aio_read       = smb_file_aio_read,
>         .write          = do_sync_write,
> Index: linux/include/linux/fs.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ linux/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1825,7 +1825,8 @@ extern void
>  file_ra_state_init(struct file_ra_state *ra, struct address_space *mapping);
>  extern loff_t no_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin);
>  extern loff_t generic_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin);
> -extern loff_t remote_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin);
> +extern loff_t remote_llseek_unlocked(struct file *file, loff_t offset,
> +                       int origin);
>  extern int generic_file_open(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp);
>  extern int nonseekable_open(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp);
>
> Index: linux/fs/nfs/file.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/nfs/file.c
> +++ linux/fs/nfs/file.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ force_reval:
>
>  static loff_t nfs_file_llseek(struct file *filp, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  {
> +       loff_t loff;
>         /* origin == SEEK_END => we must revalidate the cached file length */
>         if (origin == SEEK_END) {
>                 struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
> @@ -173,7 +174,10 @@ static loff_t nfs_file_llseek(struct fil
>                 if (retval < 0)
>                         return (loff_t)retval;
>         }
> -       return remote_llseek(filp, offset, origin);
> +       lock_kernel();  /* BKL needed? */
> +       loff = remote_llseek_unlocked(filp, offset, origin);
> +       unlock_kernel();
> +       return loff;
>  }
>
>  /*
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-27 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-27  2:17 [PATCH] [0/18] Implement some low hanging BKL removal fruit in fs/* Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [1/18] BKL-removal: Convert ext2 over to use unlocked_ioctl Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [2/18] BKL-removal: Remove incorrect BKL comment in ext2 Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [3/18] BKL-removal: Convert ext3 to use unlocked_ioctl Andi Kleen
2008-01-28  5:33   ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-28  6:02     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [4/18] ext3: Remove incorrect BKL comment Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [5/18] BKL-removal: Remove incorrect comment refering to lock_kernel() from jbd/jbd2 Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [6/18] BKL-removal: Convert ext4 to use unlocked_ioctl Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [7/18] BKL-removal: Remove incorrect comments refering to BKL from ext4 Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [8/18] BKL-removal: Remove BKL from remote_llseek Andi Kleen
2008-01-27 16:57   ` Steve French [this message]
2008-01-27 17:56     ` Trond Myklebust
2008-01-27 22:18       ` Steve French
2008-01-27 23:08         ` Trond Myklebust
2008-01-28  2:58           ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-28  4:13             ` Trond Myklebust
2008-01-28  4:38               ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-28  4:51                 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-01-28  5:13                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-28  8:17                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-28 18:33                     ` Steve French
2008-01-28 19:34                       ` Dave Kleikamp
2008-01-28 12:56                   ` Alan Cox
2008-01-28 13:27                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-28 13:38                       ` Alan Cox
2008-01-28 14:10                         ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-28 14:50                           ` Alan Cox
2008-01-28 15:13                           ` Diego Calleja
2008-01-28  2:44         ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-28  2:43     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [9/18] BKL-removal: Use unlocked_ioctl for jfs Andi Kleen
2008-01-27 23:05   ` Dave Kleikamp
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [10/18] BKL-removal: Implement a compat_ioctl handler for JFS Andi Kleen
2008-01-27 23:05   ` Dave Kleikamp
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [11/18] BKL-removal: Convert ocfs2 over to unlocked_ioctl Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [12/18] BKL-removal: Convert CIFS " Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [13/18] BKL-removal: Add compat_ioctl for cifs Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [14/18] BKL-removal: Add unlocked_fasync Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  7:05   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [15/18] BKL-removal: Convert pipe over to unlocked_fasync Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [16/18] BKL-removal: Convert socket fasync " Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [17/18] BKL-removal: Convert fuse " Andi Kleen
2008-01-27  2:17 ` [PATCH] [18/18] BKL-removal: Convert bad_inode " Andi Kleen
2008-01-28  1:59 ` [PATCH] [0/18] Implement some low hanging BKL removal fruit in fs/* Nick Piggin
2008-01-28  3:15   ` Andi Kleen
     [not found] <9Q5hR-3MI-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <9Qsob-7is-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <9QtDz-121-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <9QtWX-1qg-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <9Qugj-1PK-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-01-28  9:44         ` [PATCH] [8/18] BKL-removal: Remove BKL from remote_llseek Bodo Eggert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=524f69650801270857i6610e736q4189dc6af9b22360@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    --cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).