linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rinat Gadelshin <rgadelsh@gmail.com>
To: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com>,
	paul@paul-moore.com, eparis@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, audit@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] audit: refactor queue full checks
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 09:54:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <527bf278-48a3-1b43-a23f-dd4cbb92ef19@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230508075812.76077-2-eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com>

Hi Eiichi!

Just one one for your patch.

On 08.05.2023 10:58, Eiichi Tsukata wrote:
> Currently audit queue full checks are done in multiple places.
> Consolidate them into one audit_queue_full().
>
> Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com>
> ---
>   kernel/audit.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 9bc0b0301198..c15694e1a76b 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -341,6 +341,12 @@ static inline int audit_rate_check(void)
>   	return retval;
>   }
>   
> +static inline int audit_queue_full(const struct sk_buff_head *queue)
> +{
> +	return audit_backlog_limit &&
> +	       (skb_queue_len(queue) > audit_backlog_limit);
It seems that we should use `>=` here.
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * audit_log_lost - conditionally log lost audit message event
>    * @message: the message stating reason for lost audit message
> @@ -579,8 +585,7 @@ static void kauditd_hold_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int error)
>   	 * record on the retry queue unless it's full, in which case drop it
>   	 */
>   	if (error == -EAGAIN) {
> -		if (!audit_backlog_limit ||
> -		    skb_queue_len(&audit_retry_queue) < audit_backlog_limit) {
> +		if (!audit_queue_full(&audit_retry_queue)) {
>   			skb_queue_tail(&audit_retry_queue, skb);
>   			return;
>   		}
> @@ -589,8 +594,7 @@ static void kauditd_hold_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int error)
>   	}
>   
>   	/* if we have room in the hold queue, queue the message */
> -	if (!audit_backlog_limit ||
> -	    skb_queue_len(&audit_hold_queue) < audit_backlog_limit) {
> +	if (!audit_queue_full(&audit_hold_queue)) {
>   		skb_queue_tail(&audit_hold_queue, skb);
>   		return;
>   	}
> @@ -613,8 +617,7 @@ static void kauditd_hold_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int error)
>    */
>   static void kauditd_retry_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, __always_unused int error)
>   {
> -	if (!audit_backlog_limit ||
> -	    skb_queue_len(&audit_retry_queue) < audit_backlog_limit) {
> +	if (!audit_queue_full(&audit_retry_queue)) {
>   		skb_queue_tail(&audit_retry_queue, skb);
>   		return;
>   	}
> @@ -1564,8 +1567,7 @@ static void audit_receive(struct sk_buff  *skb)
>   	audit_ctl_unlock();
>   
>   	/* can't block with the ctrl lock, so penalize the sender now */
> -	if (audit_backlog_limit &&
> -	    (skb_queue_len(&audit_queue) > audit_backlog_limit)) {
> +	if (audit_queue_full(&audit_queue)) {
>   		DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
>   
>   		/* wake kauditd to try and flush the queue */
> @@ -1866,8 +1868,7 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>   	if (!(auditd_test_task(current) || audit_ctl_owner_current())) {
>   		long stime = audit_backlog_wait_time;
>   
> -		while (audit_backlog_limit &&
> -		       (skb_queue_len(&audit_queue) > audit_backlog_limit)) {
> +		while (audit_queue_full(&audit_queue)) {
>   			/* wake kauditd to try and flush the queue */
>   			wake_up_interruptible(&kauditd_wait);
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-10  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-08  7:58 [PATCH 0/4] audit: refactor and fix for potential deadlock Eiichi Tsukata
2023-05-08  7:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] audit: refactor queue full checks Eiichi Tsukata
2023-05-10  6:54   ` Rinat Gadelshin [this message]
2023-05-10  7:17     ` Eiichi Tsukata
2023-05-10  7:28       ` Rinat Gadelshin
2023-05-08  7:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] audit: account backlog waiting time in audit_receive() Eiichi Tsukata
2023-05-08  7:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] audit: convert DECLARE_WAITQUEUE to DEFINE_WAIT Eiichi Tsukata
2023-05-08  7:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] audit: check if queue is full after prepare_to_wait_exclusive() Eiichi Tsukata
2023-05-08 17:13   ` kernel test robot
2023-05-09  1:44     ` Eiichi Tsukata
2023-05-08 14:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] audit: refactor and fix for potential deadlock Paul Moore
2023-05-09  1:34   ` Eiichi Tsukata
2023-05-10  8:09     ` Eiichi Tsukata
2023-05-17 16:15       ` Paul Moore
2023-05-17 16:03     ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=527bf278-48a3-1b43-a23f-dd4cbb92ef19@gmail.com \
    --to=rgadelsh@gmail.com \
    --cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).