From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752258Ab3KUH4E (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 02:56:04 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:46107 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751881Ab3KUH4C (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 02:56:02 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,742,1378828800"; d="scan'208";a="9092863" Message-ID: <528DBCD1.4010409@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:57:05 +0800 From: Gao feng User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Guy Briggs CC: Li Zefan , toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eparis@redhat.com, linux-audit@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, sgrubb@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 PATCH 00/20 v2] Add namespace support for audit References: <1382599925-25143-1-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> <5271D3FC.8000709@cn.fujitsu.com> <5278A39B.6000303@cn.fujitsu.com> <5278A3D5.3010309@cn.fujitsu.com> <5278A828.50406@huawei.com> <5278B2D7.6060409@cn.fujitsu.com> <20131105191459.GF24236@madcap2.tricolour.ca> In-Reply-To: <20131105191459.GF24236@madcap2.tricolour.ca> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2013/11/21 15:54:01, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2013/11/21 15:54:02, Serialize complete at 2013/11/21 15:54:02 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/06/2013 03:14 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:56:55PM +0800, Gao feng wrote: >> On 11/05/2013 04:11 PM, Li Zefan wrote: >>> On 2013/11/5 15:52, Gao feng wrote: >>>> On 11/05/2013 03:51 PM, Gao feng wrote: >>>>> Ping... >>>> >>>> I want to catch up the merge window.. >>> >>> Even if your patches are accepted by a certain maintainer immediately, >>> he will in no doubt queue them for 3.14. >> >> Yes, you are right... >> But I still want to get some comments.. > > Definitely won't make it in in this merge window. I agree it needs > discussion, but I won't start that for at least another week (I'm > currently at IETF in Vancouver.). > Hi guys, Any comments? Thanks