From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753542Ab3KXV2h (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:28:37 -0500
Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com ([74.125.82.180]:58415 "EHLO
	mail-we0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752817Ab3KXV2M (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:28:12 -0500
Message-ID: <52926F6F.3050104@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:28:15 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?VXdlIEtsZWluZS1Lw7ZuaWc=?= 
	<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
CC: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: Do not drop unheld reference on device node
References: <1382136588-15320-1-git-send-email-treding@nvidia.com> <20131122161607.GA5088@ulmo.nvidia.com> <528F86F2.40706@linaro.org> <20131122192257.GX28642@pengutronix.de>
In-Reply-To: <20131122192257.GX28642@pengutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 11/22/2013 08:22 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:31:46PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 11/22/2013 05:16 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:49:48AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>> When booting a recent kernel on ARM with OF_DYNAMIC enabled, the kernel
>>>> warns about the following:
>>>>
>>>> 	[    0.000000] ERROR: Bad of_node_put() on /timer@50004600
>>>> 	[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc5-next-20131017-00077-gedfd827-dirty #406
>>>> 	[    0.000000] [<c0015b68>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c00117e4>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>>>> 	[    0.000000] [<c00117e4>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c055f734>] (dump_stack+0x9c/0xc8)
>>>> 	[    0.000000] [<c055f734>] (dump_stack+0x9c/0xc8) from [<c03b47d4>] (of_node_release+0x90/0x9c)
>>>> 	[    0.000000] [<c03b47d4>] (of_node_release+0x90/0x9c) from [<c03b5084>] (of_find_matching_node_and_match+0x78/0xb4)
>>>> 	[    0.000000] [<c03b5084>] (of_find_matching_node_and_match+0x78/0xb4) from [<c07887c8>] (clocksource_of_init+0x60/0x70)
>>>> 	[    0.000000] [<c07887c8>] (clocksource_of_init+0x60/0x70) from [<c076e99c>] (start_kernel+0x1f4/0x33c)
>>>> 	[    0.000000] [<c076e99c>] (start_kernel+0x1f4/0x33c) from [<80008074>] (0x80008074)
>>>>
>>>> This is caused by clocksource_of_init() dropping a reference on the
>>>> device node that it never took. The reference taken by the loop is
>>>> implicitly dropped on subsequent iterations. See the implementation of
>>>> and the comment on top of the of_find_matching_node_and_match()
>>>> function for reference (no pun intended).
> I only saw the end of the comment saying:
>
> 	Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use
> 	of_node_put() on it when done.
>
> Maybe that could be improved to something like:
>
> /**
>   * of_find_matching_node_and_match - Find a node based on an of_device_id
>   *                                   match table
>   * @from: The node to start searching from or NULL, the node you pass
>   *        will not be searched, only the next one will; typically, you
>   *        pass what the previous call returned.
>   * @matches: ...
>   * @match: ...
>   *
>   * Reference counting: Puts a reference on @from and increases the
>   * reference count of the returned node.
>   */
>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c | 1 -
>>>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> Can someone look at this?
>>
>> Yes. Sounds like I missed it.
>>
>> This regression has been introduced by:
>>
>> commit 326e31eebe61dc838e031ea16968b2cfb43443e3
>> Author: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> Date:   Tue Oct 1 11:00:53 2013 +0200
>>
>>      clocksource: Put nodes passed to CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE
>> callbacks centrally
>>
>>      Instead of letting each driver call of_node_put do it centrally in the
>>      loop that also calls the CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE callbacks. This is less
>>      prone to error and also moves getting and putting the references
>> into the
>>      same function.
>>
>>      Consequently all respective of_node_put calls in drivers are removed.
>>
>>      Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>      Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>      Acked-by: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
> Still all but the hook in clocksource_of_init of this commit was
> correct, right? (Well, but this buggy hunk makes the commit log wrong.)

I don't understand your comment, can you elaborate ?

Thanks
   -- Daniel

-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog