From: David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
To: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
davem@davemloft.net,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/16] ARM: use a function table for determining instruction interpreter action
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:06:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F04B18.4020905@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391437498.3509.11.camel@linaro1.home>
On 02/03/14 09:24, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 15:05 -0500, David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
>>
>> Make the instruction interpreter call back to semantic action functions
>> through a function pointer array provided by the invoker. The interpreter
>> decodes the instructions into groups and uses the group number to index
>> into the supplied array. kprobes and uprobes code will each supply their
>> own array of functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
>> @@ -378,10 +378,11 @@ static const int decode_struct_sizes[NUM_DECODE_TYPES] = {
>> */
>> int __kprobes
>> kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi,
>> - const union decode_item *table, bool thumb)
>> + const union decode_item *table, bool thumb,
>> + const union decode_action *actions)
>> {
>> - const struct decode_header *h = (struct decode_header *)table;
>> - const struct decode_header *next;
>> + struct decode_header *h = (struct decode_header *)table;
>> + struct decode_header *next;
>
> The decode tables are fixed structures which nothing should want to
> modify, so I think the const's above should be kept. I believe that
> you've had to resort to changing them because the following typedef
> lacks a 'const' on the final argument....
>
I've made the change.
> [...]
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.h b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.h
>> index c610fa9..81b6e61 100644
> [...]
>>
>> +typedef enum kprobe_insn (probes_custom_decode_t)(kprobe_opcode_t,
>> + struct arch_specific_insn *,
>> + struct decode_header *);
>> +
>
> Adding 'const' above will also have the knock on effect of requiring
> const on all the 'custom decode' functions as well.
>
I've made those numerous changes as well.
-dl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-23 20:05 [PATCH v5 00/16] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] uprobes: allow ignoring of probe hits David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] ARM: move shared uprobe/kprobe definitions into new include file David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] ARM: Move generic arm instruction parsing code to new files for sharing between features David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] ARM: move generic thumb instruction parsing code to new files for use by other feature David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] ARM: use a function table for determining instruction interpreter action David Long
2014-02-03 14:24 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2014-02-04 2:06 ` David Long [this message]
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] ARM: Disable jprobes test when built into thumb-mode kernel David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] ARM: Remove use of struct kprobe from generic probes code David Long
2014-02-03 14:57 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2014-02-04 2:07 ` David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] ARM: Use new opcode type in ARM kprobes/uprobes code David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] ARM: Make the kprobes condition_check symbol names more generic David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] ARM: Change more ARM kprobes symbol names to something more David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] ARM: Rename the shared kprobes/uprobe return value enum David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] ARM: Change the remaining shared kprobes/uprobes symbols to something generic David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] ARM: Add an emulate flag to the kprobes/uprobes instruction decode functions David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] ARM: Make arch_specific_insn a define for new arch_probes_insn structure David Long
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] ARM: add uprobes support David Long
2014-02-03 16:36 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2014-02-03 20:37 ` Rabin Vincent
2014-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] ARM: Remove uprobes dependency on kprobes David Long
2014-02-03 15:45 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2014-02-04 2:15 ` David Long
2014-02-03 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 00/16] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F04B18.4020905@linaro.org \
--to=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tixy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).