From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753723AbaBDCPX (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:15:23 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:34445 "EHLO mail-qa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752388AbaBDCPS (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:15:18 -0500 Message-ID: <52F04D33.5080208@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:15:15 -0500 From: David Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , Peter Zijlstra , Srikar Dronamraju , Oleg Nesterov , Anil S Keshavamurthy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rabin Vincent , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Masami Hiramatsu , davem@davemloft.net, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/16] ARM: Remove uprobes dependency on kprobes References: <1390507559-4697-1-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org> <1390507559-4697-17-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org> <1391442358.3509.19.camel@linaro1.home> In-Reply-To: <1391442358.3509.19.camel@linaro1.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/03/14 10:45, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 15:05 -0500, David Long wrote: >> From: "David A. Long" >> >> Now that arm uprobes support has been made separate from the arm kprobes code >> the Kconfig can be changed to reflect that. >> >> Signed-off-by: David A. Long >> --- >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> index fec5a6b..9ddc4ae 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> @@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ config NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE >> def_bool y >> >> config ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES >> - depends on KPROBES >> def_bool y >> >> config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK > > > Was this patch meant to have other contents? If not, it seems a bit > pointless as all it does is remove a line added in the previous patch, > so should just be folded into that one. > That patch was added late to a much earlier rev. It should have been merged with the previous patch before now. I have just done so. -dl