On 13/02/14 11:03, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 12/02/14 15:18, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> 
>> However, I hacked together the patch below, which "fixes" the issue for
>> 96m and dss fclk. It sets the clock parents so that the x2 clocks are
>> skipped, and makes the x2 clock nodes compatible with "unused", making
>> them effectively disappear. I only verified dss fclk, so Christoph, can
>> you verify the 96m clock?
> 
> Aaand the hack patch I sent is crap... We can't skip the x2 clock path,
> as the dpll4_mNx2_ck clock nodes handle enable/disable bit, which is
> present on 3630 also.
> 
> I think the best and simplest way to fix this is by setting the
> multiplier in the dpll4_mNx2_mul_ck nodes to 1. I don't know why I
> didn't think of it yesterday.
> 
> I have a bunch of other patches needed to get the clocks right, so I'll
> send a series separately a bit later today.

I just sent the "OMAP: OMAP3 DSS related clock patches" series to l-o
and arm lists, which hopefully solves issues discussed in this thread.

 Tomi