From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680BDC352A4 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF8B2080C for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="F2BAN9kw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727975AbgBKDFX (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 22:05:23 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:58421 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727688AbgBKDFW (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 22:05:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1581390321; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KvcEiX4twRYkY9tlcW0KR6JhbG2eCzmXY2UKM+U0WS8=; b=F2BAN9kwmVjPvwhjS3lsVEYshy9X5xt2YZjdsEj34mVLH2cA3zaC79g1aY7CO+VXeZ0/92 aEeUNY0KhIkM0cx2tODF7vlTyfKrEmVAOW9cLjHRnEGGfdRzi0LPqsk4pRBjcSnkIRIGEE cw91xtIPAXmnMRB9DKciLA/qW4cQ4gs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-364-ZeDow6a7McejZRi6GEvWJQ-1; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 22:05:20 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ZeDow6a7McejZRi6GEvWJQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 848AB8017DF; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.72.12.184] (ovpn-12-184.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.184]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3672C60BF4; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] virtio: introduce a vDPA based transport To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: mst@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, rob.miller@broadcom.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, haotian.wang@sifive.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com, eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com, parav@mellanox.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, stefanha@redhat.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, aadam@redhat.com, jiri@mellanox.com, shahafs@mellanox.com, hanand@xilinx.com, mhabets@solarflare.com References: <20200210035608.10002-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20200210035608.10002-5-jasowang@redhat.com> <20200210133442.GS23346@mellanox.com> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: <530d9dbe-39c0-db0c-d13a-0719e5ade777@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:04:57 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200210133442.GS23346@mellanox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/2/10 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=889:34, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:56:07AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> This patch introduces a vDPA transport for virtio. This is used to >> use kernel virtio driver to drive the mediated device that is capable >> of populating virtqueue directly. > Is this comment still right? Is there a mediated device still? > > Jason No, will fix. Thanks >