From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263082AbTLBSTF (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:19:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262817AbTLBSTF (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:19:05 -0500 Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:21959 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263082AbTLBSTD (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:19:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:19:02 +0100 (MET) From: "Robert Freund" To: Christophe Saout Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1070384429.21490.4.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.0-test11 missing acpi-performance interface on centrino X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #3960793 Message-ID: <5332.1070389142@www60.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > [1.] One line summary of the problem: > > In 2.6.0-test11 the acpi/performance interface is missing on centrino. > > I would say this is simply because ACPI is not used within the centrino > cpufreq interface driver. You should use the sysfs interface anyway. The latter is certainly right... but since there is a kernel config option that lets you add the /proc/acpi/.../performance interface explicitly and it doesn't work, I consider it a bug. Robert