From: Stanislav Meduna <stano@meduna.org>
To: jordan <triplesquarednine@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: BUG: spinlock trylock failure on UP - reverting timer patches helps
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:45:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53513A7E.5050907@meduna.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOcfFMyTmQH-FwGE2YWoA76ypzBtWPYVTyi+4QpEMnrRtw8QVg@mail.gmail.com>
On 18.04.2014 01:10, jordan wrote:
Hi Jordan,
many thanks for the tests. I probably botched something during
the reverting - I now tried some more experiments and the system
now runs without BUGs and without kernel leak - of course
it needs some more uptime to be really sure.
My combined revert patch from 3.12.15-rt25 is at
http://pastebin.com/MYLqbmZw
That was all that was needed.
> Yeah, i know a handful of people [amd users] that have now reported
> success booting into 3.14-rt1 reverting those patches. Personally, I
> have disabled NO_HZ_FULL and have switched back to 'old tick' method
> in kconfig. I don't think the latest no_hz stuff is stable enough...
My problems were with periodic timers (I am on an embedded system
that runs things periodically anyway and I have also my doubts
regarding the stability), so the latest code did not break
only NO_HZ_FULL.
Thanks
--
Stano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-18 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <534C3606.7010206@meduna.org>
2014-04-14 23:45 ` BUG: spinlock trylock failure on UP, i.MX28 3.12.15-rt25 Stanislav Meduna
2014-04-15 22:08 ` Stanislav Meduna
2014-04-17 16:29 ` BUG: spinlock trylock failure on UP - reverting timer patches helps Stanislav Meduna
2014-04-17 22:55 ` Stanislav Meduna
2014-04-17 23:10 ` jordan
2014-04-18 1:15 ` jordan
2014-04-18 14:45 ` Stanislav Meduna [this message]
2014-04-18 15:09 ` jordan
2014-04-22 11:54 ` BUG: spinlock trylock failure on UP, i.MX28 3.12.15-rt25 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-04-22 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-22 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-23 8:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-04-23 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-22 16:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-04-22 17:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-22 18:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-23 7:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-04-23 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-23 12:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-02 18:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-05-02 19:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-02 19:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-02 19:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53513A7E.5050907@meduna.org \
--to=stano@meduna.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=triplesquarednine@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).