linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] printk: Re-add irqsave/restore in printk_sched
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 13:16:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5367F1B4.2010704@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140504161312.GL17778@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 05/04/2014 09:13 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Fri 02-05-14 15:09:15, John Stultz wrote:
>>> A commit in akpm's tree (printk: remove separate printk_sched
>>> buffers...), removed the printk_sched irqsave/restore lines
>>> since it was safe for current users. Since we may be expanding
>>> usage of printk_sched(), re-add the irqsave/restore logic
>>> to make the functionality more generally safe.
>>   So I'm just wondering: Do you have anything particular for which you need
>> interrupts disabled? Won't e.g. disabling preemption be enough?
> Yeah, I think preemption disabled is sufficient.

Ok, will change this and resend.

thanks
-john

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-05 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-02 22:09 [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2) John Stultz
2014-05-02 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] printk: Re-add irqsave/restore in printk_sched John Stultz
2014-05-04 14:58   ` Jan Kara
2014-05-04 16:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 20:16       ` John Stultz [this message]
2014-05-02 22:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] printk: Rename printk_sched to printk_deferred John Stultz
2014-05-02 22:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: Add printk_once_deferred John Stultz
2014-05-02 22:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] timekeeping: Use printk_deferred when holding timekeeping seqlock John Stultz
2014-05-02 23:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2) Andrew Morton
2014-05-05 15:30   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-05 18:42   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-05 20:25     ` John Stultz
2014-05-05 20:15   ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5367F1B4.2010704@linaro.org \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).