From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754983AbaEEUZH (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2014 16:25:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:54868 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752150AbaEEUZF (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2014 16:25:05 -0400 Message-ID: <5367F39C.1050703@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 13:25:00 -0700 From: John Stultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton CC: LKML , Jan Kara , Peter Zijlstra , Jiri Bohac , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2) References: <1399068558-2373-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> <20140502160536.892e6aff76df3398529d09ad@linux-foundation.org> <20140505144231.654d85b0@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20140505144231.654d85b0@gandalf.local.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/05/2014 11:42 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2014 16:05:36 -0700 > Andrew Morton wrote: > > >> Would "printk_deferred_once" be more logical than >> "printk_once_deferred"? Think so. It's (((printk(deferred(once))), >> not (((printk(once(deferred))). >> > I agree with the above, but other than that you can add my: > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt Thanks, will do! > > also, perhaps this series should include my patch: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/336 So this set applies ontop of -mm, which I believe includes your change. If I try to cherry-pick your patch to include in my set, I think I have to cherry-pick Jan's changes as well, so its probably just easier for folks to grab -mm. :) thanks -john