From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751927AbaEOAT5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 20:19:57 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:34630 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751126AbaEOATz (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 20:19:55 -0400 Message-ID: <537407ED.8050606@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 17:18:53 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Hart , "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Jakub Jelinek CC: "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" , lkml , Davidlohr Bueso , Arnd Bergmann , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Linux API , "Carlos O'Donell" Subject: Re: futex(2) man page update help request References: <537346E5.4050407@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/14/2014 09:18 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > > However, unless I'm sorely mistaken, the larger problem is that glibc > removed the futex() call entirely, so these man pages don't describe > something users even have access to anymore. I had to revert to calling > the syscalls directly in the futextest test suite because of this: > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dvhart/futextest.git/tree/inclu > de/futextest.h#n67 > This really comes down to the fact that we should have a libinux which contains the basic system call wrapper machinery for Linux specific things and nothing else. syscall(3) is toxic and breaks randomly on some platforms. -hpa