linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chegu_vinod@hp.com,
	mgorman@suse.de, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/7] sched,numa: remove task_h_load from task_numa_compare
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 01:39:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AA608F.50301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140625053138.GF6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/25/2014 01:31 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:25:00AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 06/25/2014 01:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:07:35AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra
>>> wrote:
>>>> Shall I merge this into patch 3?
>>> 
>>> Which gets me the below; which is has a wrong changelog.
>>> 
>>> task_h_load() already computes the load as seen from the root 
>>> group. effective_load() just does a better (and more expensive)
>>> job of computing the task movement implications of a move.
>>> 
>>> So the total effect of this patch shouldn't be very big;
>>> regular load balancing also only uses task_h_load(), see
>>> move_tasks().
>>> 
>>> Now, we don't run with preemption disabled, don't run as
>>> often, etc.., so maybe we can indeed use the more expensive
>>> variant just fine, but does it really matter?
>> 
>> In my testing, it appears to make a difference between workloads 
>> converging, and workloads sitting with one last thread stuck on 
>> another node that never gets moved...
> 
> Fair enough; can you provide a new Changelog that I can paste in?

Here it goes:

When CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is enabled, the load that a task places
on a CPU is determined by the group the task is in. The active groups
on the source and destination CPU can be different, resulting in a
different load contribution by the same task at its source and at its
destination. As a result, the load needs to be calculated separately
for each CPU, instead of estimated once with task_h_load.

Getting this calculation right allows some workloads to converge,
where previously the last thread could get stuck on another node,
without being able to migrate to its final destination.




- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTqmCPAAoJEM553pKExN6D4/IH/1Ez7G3jAnYFpQYvH/wSm75V
kbH+mouLAqeICjHRdXAr1SGuD8i85JeUeDU2+SymdhC+hwZXbvR/aQfX0/ok4kN7
e7kJbaNS6Lrq3bDjm74aTpMKB+zK2OExqR1DQBXwynbUahAyx3+9uXNDYp35yZwo
tt+h3Rdrmy2lTTpE0fuEjGc8ODrEJjeWyYAVxT/aQXnwgfXfp6BZ1SEXyRRmrxR0
BunsgWTO7uBxGGEIZrrm/l7mdIrsi4oAN9C4RA7v6LMR6cUW9Fj5o6iva9X714wG
txP4/AGowucS5VckN1RIaM8/pzMB3MVuAmCTX4PqWg1jf3eggcQpe5/4/bVYUqQ=
=QgYM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-25  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-23 15:41 [PATCH 0/7] sched,numa: improve NUMA convergence times riel
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched,numa: use group's max nid as task's preferred nid riel
2014-06-25 10:31   ` Mel Gorman
2014-07-05 10:44   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Use group's max nid as task' s " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched,numa: use effective_load to balance NUMA loads riel
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched,numa: simplify task_numa_compare riel
2014-06-25 10:39   ` Mel Gorman
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched,numa: examine a task move when examining a task swap riel
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched,numa: rework best node setting in task_numa_migrate riel
2014-07-05 10:45   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Rework best node setting in task_numa_migrate() tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched,numa: change scan period code to match intent riel
2014-06-25 10:19   ` Mel Gorman
2014-07-05 10:45   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Change " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-06-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 8/7] sched,numa: do not let a move increase the imbalance Rik van Riel
2014-06-24 14:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-24 15:30     ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-25  1:57     ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-24 19:14 ` [PATCH 9/7] sched,numa: remove task_h_load from task_numa_compare Rik van Riel
2014-06-25  5:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-25  5:09     ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-25  5:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-25  5:25       ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-25  5:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-25  5:39           ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-06-25  5:57             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53AA608F.50301@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).