From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758018AbaFYSNb (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:13:31 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:60641 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757488AbaFYSN2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:13:28 -0400 Message-ID: <53AB1140.7070904@collabora.co.uk> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:13:20 +0200 From: Javier Martinez Canillas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Anderson CC: Lee Jones , Samuel Ortiz , Mark Brown , Mike Turquette , Liam Girdwood , Alessandro Zummo , Kukjin Kim , Olof Johansson , Sjoerd Simons , Daniel Stone , Tomeu Vizoso , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , linux-samsung-soc , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/14] clk: max77686: Improve Maxim 77686 PMIC clocks binding References: <1403202040-12641-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1403202040-12641-5-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Doug, Thanks a lot for your feedback. On 06/25/2014 08:06 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Javier, > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas > wrote: >> @@ -33,6 +38,6 @@ Example: Clock consumer node >> foo@0 { >> compatible = "bar,foo"; >> /* ... */ >> - clock-names = "my-clock"; >> - clocks = <&max77686 2>; >> + clock-names = "32khz_pmic"; >> + clocks = <&max77686 MAX77686_CLK_PMIC>; > > A minor comment here is that you probably shouldn't change "clock-names". > > The "clock-names" is the consumer's concept of the clock name and not > the producer's concept. If this clock were specified as going into > the TPM, for instance, the TPM might call it "32k-reference". Then > the TPM would get the clock by referring to this name in its driver. > > -Doug > You're right. I won't change the clock names in the next version of the patch-set. Best regards, Javier