linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<bp@alien8.de>, <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	<tony.luck@intel.com>, <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	<huawei.libin@huawei.com>, <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
	<peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:18:50 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D5CF2A.2030007@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53CF2A81.7080505@jp.fujitsu.com>

Ping.

(2014/07/23 12:22), Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> llc_shared_map is not cleared even if CPU is offline or hot removed.
> So when hot-plugging CPU and assigning new CPU number to hot-added CPU,
> the mask has wrong value. The mask is used by CSF schduler to create
> sched_domain. So it breaks CFS scheduler.
>
> Here is a example on my system.
> My system has 4 sockets and each socket has 15 cores and HT is enabled.
> In this case, each core of sockes is numbered as follows:
>
>           | CPU#
> Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
> Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
> Socket#2 | 30-44, 90-104
> Socket#3 | 45-59, 105-119
>
> Then llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 has 0x3fff80000001fffc0000000.
> It means that last level cache of Socket#2 is shared with
> CPU#30-44 and 90-104.
>
> When hot-removing socket#2 and #3, each core of sockets is numbered
> as follows:
>
>           | CPU#
> Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
> Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
>
> But llc_shared_mask is not cleared. So llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 remains
> having 0x3fff80000001fffc0000000.
>
> After that, when hot-adding socket#2 and #3, each core of sockets is
> numbered as follows:
>
>           | CPU#
> Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
> Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
> Socket#2 | 30-59
> Socket#3 | 90-119
>
> Then llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 becomes 0x3fff8000fffffffc0000000.
> It means that last level cache of Socket#2 is shared with CPU#30-59
> and 90-104. So the mask has wrong value.
>
> At first, I cleared hot-removed CPU number's bit from llc_shared_map
> when hot removing CPU. But Borislav suggested that the problem will
> disappear if readded CPU is assigned same CPU number. And llc_shared_map
> must not be changed.
>
> So the patch assigns same CPU number to readded CPU by linking CPU
> number to APIC ID. And by the patch, the problem disappers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> ---
> v2: change cpuid to cpunum
> v3: fix Borislav's email address of Suggested-by
>      fix typo (ACPI ID to APIC ID)
> v4: change cpu_used_xxx to cpu_number_xxx
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> index ad28db7..5cecc3b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -220,6 +220,23 @@ static void apic_pm_activate(void);
>   static unsigned long apic_phys;
>
>   /*
> + * Bind APIC ID to Logical CPU number
> + * Logical CPU number to APIC ID does not change by this array
> + * even if CPU is hotplugged. So don't clear the array even if
> + * CPU is hot-removed
> + */
> +static int apicid_to_cpunum[MAX_LOCAL_APIC] = {
> +    [0 ... MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1] = -1,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Represent Logical CPU number bound to APIC ID
> + * Don't clear a bit even if CPU is hot-removed
> + */
> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_number_bits, CONFIG_NR_CPUS);
> +static struct cpumask *const cpu_number_mask = to_cpumask(cpu_number_bits);
> +
> +/*
>    * Get the LAPIC version
>    */
>   static inline int lapic_get_version(void)
> @@ -2122,6 +2139,17 @@ void disconnect_bsp_APIC(int virt_wire_setup)
>       apic_write(APIC_LVT1, value);
>   }
>
> +static int get_cpunum(int apicid)
> +{
> +    int cpu;
> +
> +    cpu = apicid_to_cpunum[apicid];
> +    if (cpu < 0)
> +        cpu = cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_number_mask);
> +
> +    return cpu;
> +}
> +
>   int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
>   {
>       int cpu, max = nr_cpu_ids;
> @@ -2199,7 +2227,9 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
>            */
>           cpu = 0;
>       } else
> -        cpu = cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_present_mask);
> +        cpu = get_cpunum(apicid);
> +
> +    apicid_to_cpunum[apicid] = cpu;
>
>       /*
>        * Validate version
> @@ -2228,6 +2258,7 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
>       early_per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid, cpu) =
>           apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid(cpu);
>   #endif
> +    cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_number_mask);
>       set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
>       set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-28  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-23  3:22 [PATCH v4] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-07-28  4:18 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
2014-09-04  2:46   ` [PATCH v5] " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-09-11  7:21     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-09-15  4:25       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-09-15 16:44         ` Toshi Kani
2014-09-16  3:56           ` Mike Galbraith
2014-09-16  9:53             ` Wanpeng Li
2014-09-16 10:00               ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53D5CF2A.2030007@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).