From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm: page_alloc: Reduce cost of the fair zone allocation policy
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:34:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E8B83D.1070004@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140811121241.GD7970@suse.de>
On 08/11/2014 02:12 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:27:15PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 07/09/2014 10:13 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> @@ -1604,6 +1604,9 @@ again:
>>> }
>>>
>>> __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ALLOC_BATCH, -(1 << order));
>>
>> This can underflow zero, right?
>>
>
> Yes, because of per-cpu accounting drift.
I meant mainly because of order > 0.
>>> + if (zone_page_state(zone, NR_ALLOC_BATCH) == 0 &&
>>
>> AFAICS, zone_page_state will correct negative values to zero only for
>> CONFIG_SMP. Won't this check be broken on !CONFIG_SMP?
>>
>
> On !CONFIG_SMP how can there be per-cpu accounting drift that would make
> that counter negative?
Well original code used "if (zone_page_state(zone, NR_ALLOC_BATCH) <=
0)" elsewhere, that you are replacing with zone_is_fair_depleted check.
I assumed it's because it can get negative due to order > 0. I might
have not looked thoroughly enough but it seems to me there's nothing
that would prevent it, such as skipping a zone because its remaining
batch is lower than 1 << order.
So I think the check should be "<= 0" to be safe.
Vlastimil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-11 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 8:13 [PATCH 0/5] Reduce sequential read overhead Mel Gorman
2014-07-09 8:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: pagemap: Avoid unnecessary overhead when tracepoints are deactivated Mel Gorman
2014-07-10 12:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-07-09 8:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: Rearrange zone fields into read-only, page alloc, statistics and page reclaim lines Mel Gorman
2014-07-10 12:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-07-09 8:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm: Move zone->pages_scanned into a vmstat counter Mel Gorman
2014-07-10 12:08 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-07-09 8:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm: vmscan: Only update per-cpu thresholds for online CPU Mel Gorman
2014-07-10 12:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-07-09 8:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm: page_alloc: Abort fair zone allocation policy when remotes nodes are encountered Mel Gorman
2014-07-10 12:14 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-07-10 12:44 ` Mel Gorman
2014-07-09 8:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: page_alloc: Reduce cost of the fair zone allocation policy Mel Gorman
2014-07-10 12:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-08-08 15:27 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-08-11 12:12 ` Mel Gorman
2014-08-11 12:34 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2014-09-02 14:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-09-05 10:14 ` [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: Fix setting of ZONE_FAIR_DEPLETED on UP Mel Gorman
2014-09-07 6:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2014-09-08 11:57 ` [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: Fix setting of ZONE_FAIR_DEPLETED on UP v2 Mel Gorman
2014-09-09 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2014-09-10 9:16 ` Mel Gorman
2014-09-10 20:32 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E8B83D.1070004@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).