From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753887AbaIEPcP (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:32:15 -0400 Received: from mailout32.mail01.mtsvc.net ([216.70.64.70]:42942 "EHLO n23.mail01.mtsvc.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751271AbaIEPcM (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:32:12 -0400 Message-ID: <5409D76D.2070203@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:31:57 -0400 From: Peter Hurley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Laight , Jakub Jelinek , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Tony Luck , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Oleg Nesterov , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Mackerras , "Paul E. McKenney" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Miroslav Franc , Richard Henderson , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bit fields && data tearing References: <20140712181328.GA8738@redhat.com> <54079B70.4050200@hurleysoftware.com> <1409785893.30640.118.camel@pasglop> <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D17487172@AcuExch.aculab.com> <1409824374.4246.62.camel@pasglop> <5408E458.3@zytor.com> <54090AF4.7060406@hurleysoftware.com> <54091B30.7080100@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <54091B30.7080100@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: 990527 peter@hurleysoftware.com X-MT-ID: 8FA290C2A27252AACF65DBC4A42F3CE3735FB2A4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/04/2014 10:08 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/04/2014 05:59 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: >> I have no idea how prevalent the ev56 is compared to the ev5. >> Still we're talking about a chip that came out in 1996. > > Ah yes, I stand corrected. According to Wikipedia, the affected CPUs > were all the 2106x CPUs (EV4, EV45, LCA4, LCA45) plus the 21164 with no > suffix (EV5). However, we're still talking about museum pieces here. > > I wonder what the one I have in my garage is... I'm sure I could emulate > it faster, though. Which is a bit ironic because I remember when Digital had a team working on emulating native x86 apps on Alpha/NT.