linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@amazon.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/13] Revert "locking/spinlocks: Remove the unused spin_lock_bh_nested() API"
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:25:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <541e72f2-f836-1534-cd86-f3f0a13074a7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201207132456.65472-4-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>

On 12/7/20 8:24 AM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> This reverts commit 607904c357c61adf20b8fd18af765e501d61a385 to use
> spin_lock_bh_nested() in the next commit.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/9d290a57-49e1-04cd-2487-262b0d7c5844@gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
> CC: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

If there is a use case for spin_lock_bh_nested(), it is perfectly fine 
to add it back.

Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

> ---
>   include/linux/spinlock.h         | 8 ++++++++
>   include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | 2 ++
>   include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h  | 1 +
>   kernel/locking/spinlock.c        | 8 ++++++++
>   4 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
> index 79897841a2cc..c020b375a071 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
> @@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ static inline void do_raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock)
>   #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
>   # define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass) \
>   	_raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)
> +# define raw_spin_lock_bh_nested(lock, subclass) \
> +	_raw_spin_lock_bh_nested(lock, subclass)
>   
>   # define raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock)			\
>   	 do {								\
> @@ -242,6 +244,7 @@ static inline void do_raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock)
>   # define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)		\
>   	_raw_spin_lock(((void)(subclass), (lock)))
>   # define raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock)	_raw_spin_lock(lock)
> +# define raw_spin_lock_bh_nested(lock, subclass)	_raw_spin_lock_bh(lock)
>   #endif
>   
>   #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
> @@ -369,6 +372,11 @@ do {								\
>   	raw_spin_lock_nested(spinlock_check(lock), subclass);	\
>   } while (0)
>   
> +#define spin_lock_bh_nested(lock, subclass)			\
> +do {								\
> +	raw_spin_lock_bh_nested(spinlock_check(lock), subclass);\
> +} while (0)
> +
>   #define spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock)				\
>   do {									\
>   	raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(spinlock_check(lock), nest_lock);	\
> diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h b/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
> index 19a9be9d97ee..d565fb6304f2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ int in_lock_functions(unsigned long addr);
>   void __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)		__acquires(lock);
>   void __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock_nested(raw_spinlock_t *lock, int subclass)
>   								__acquires(lock);
> +void __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock_bh_nested(raw_spinlock_t *lock, int subclass)
> +								__acquires(lock);
>   void __lockfunc
>   _raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock, struct lockdep_map *map)
>   								__acquires(lock);
> diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h b/include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h
> index d0d188861ad6..d3afef9d8dbe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
>   
>   #define _raw_spin_lock(lock)			__LOCK(lock)
>   #define _raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)	__LOCK(lock)
> +#define _raw_spin_lock_bh_nested(lock, subclass) __LOCK(lock)
>   #define _raw_read_lock(lock)			__LOCK(lock)
>   #define _raw_write_lock(lock)			__LOCK(lock)
>   #define _raw_spin_lock_bh(lock)			__LOCK_BH(lock)
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
> index 0ff08380f531..48e99ed1bdd8 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
> @@ -363,6 +363,14 @@ void __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock_nested(raw_spinlock_t *lock, int subclass)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(_raw_spin_lock_nested);
>   
> +void __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock_bh_nested(raw_spinlock_t *lock, int subclass)
> +{
> +	__local_bh_disable_ip(_RET_IP_, SOFTIRQ_LOCK_OFFSET);
> +	spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
> +	LOCK_CONTENDED(lock, do_raw_spin_trylock, do_raw_spin_lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_raw_spin_lock_bh_nested);
> +
>   unsigned long __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_nested(raw_spinlock_t *lock,
>   						   int subclass)
>   {



  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-07 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-07 13:24 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/13] Socket migration for SO_REUSEPORT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/13] tcp: Allow TCP_CLOSE sockets to hold the reuseport group Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/13] bpf: Define migration types for SO_REUSEPORT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/13] Revert "locking/spinlocks: Remove the unused spin_lock_bh_nested() API" Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 16:25   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/13] tcp: Introduce inet_csk_reqsk_queue_migrate() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/13] tcp: Set the new listener to migrated TFO requests Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/13] tcp: Migrate TCP_ESTABLISHED/TCP_SYN_RECV sockets in accept queues Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/13] tcp: Migrate TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV requests Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/13] bpf: Introduce two attach types for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_REUSEPORT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/13] libbpf: Set expected_attach_type " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/13] bpf: Add migration to sk_reuseport_(kern|md) Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/13] bpf: Support BPF_FUNC_get_socket_cookie() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_REUSEPORT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/13] bpf: Call bpf_run_sk_reuseport() for socket migration Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-12-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 13/13] bpf: Test BPF_SK_REUSEPORT_SELECT_OR_MIGRATE Kuniyuki Iwashima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=541e72f2-f836-1534-cd86-f3f0a13074a7@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@amazon.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).