From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754486AbaI2QCV (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:02:21 -0400 Received: from ducie-dc1.codethink.co.uk ([185.25.241.215]:39175 "EHLO ducie-dc1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754404AbaI2QCT (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:02:19 -0400 Message-ID: <54298287.6020806@codethink.co.uk> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:02:15 +0100 From: Rob Jones User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@codethink.co.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: proc: use __seq_open_private() References: <1410530978-29627-1-git-send-email-rob.jones@codethink.co.uk> <1410530978-29627-2-git-send-email-rob.jones@codethink.co.uk> <20140912145456.863d25e38db6fa5dea60845d@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20140912145456.863d25e38db6fa5dea60845d@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/09/14 22:54, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:09:37 +0100 Rob Jones wrote: > >> Reduce boilerplate code by using __seq_open_private() instead of seq_open(). > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fs-proc-task_nommuc-change-maps_open-to-use-__seq_open_private.patch > already did this. This duplicated only half of my submission, patch 2/2 did a similar operation on a different file (fs/proc/task_mmu.c). https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/12/347 Is that one actually going in (with Andrew's rename to include the file name) or should I resubmit it on its own? -- Rob Jones Codethink Ltd mailto:rob.jones@codethink.co.uk tel:+44 161 236 5575