From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753837AbaJQTX1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:23:27 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:7522 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753298AbaJQTXZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:23:25 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,862,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="401998577" Message-ID: <54416CA2.2010701@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:23:14 +0200 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Grant Likely , Arnd Bergmann , Mika Westerberg , ACPI Devel Maling List , Aaron Lu , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Dmitry Torokhov , Bryan Wu , Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support References: <2660541.BycO7TFnA2@vostro.rjw.lan> <11223831.j9KAEfSQsY@vostro.rjw.lan> <20141017154007.GB29643@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20141017154007.GB29643@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/14 17:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC, we >> now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully). >> >> Changes have been made to patch [02/12] and to patches [09-12/12], although >> in patches [10-12/12] they are fairly minor. I have retained the Greg's >> ACK on patch [02/12], because it is essentially the same that have been >> posted aleady and ACKed by him (Greg, please let me know if I shouldn't >> do that) and all the ACKs on the remaining patches except for patch [09/12] >> which is substantially different. Still, if reviewers think that their >> ACKs don't apply any more, please let me know and I'll remove them. > > No objection from me to keep my ACK on those patches, thanks for asking. > > greg k-h > Mine certainly still apply as well. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center