From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751612AbaKBTTq (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2014 14:19:46 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:58164 "EHLO mail-wi0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751206AbaKBTTn (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2014 14:19:43 -0500 Message-ID: <545683C9.6000101@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 20:19:37 +0100 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 To: Jason Cooper CC: Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Ezequiel Garcia , Thomas Petazzoni , Benoit Masson , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes References: <1411157684-6991-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <20141101223625.GB3698@titan.lakedaemon.net> <54556341.6040506@gmail.com> <20141102190333.GV3698@titan.lakedaemon.net> In-Reply-To: <20141102190333.GV3698@titan.lakedaemon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02.11.2014 20:03, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 11:48:33PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >> On 01.11.2014 23:36, Jason Cooper wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >>>> this is a patch set preparing barebox support for ix4-300d. As usual, >>>> I stumbled upon a few nice-to-haves before actually touching ix4-300d >>>> dts. As it is a mach-mvebu thing, I just added the related mailing >>>> lists instead of each of the DT maintainers. >>>> >>>> First 5 patches consolidate SoC-specific pinctrl nodes to one common >>>> node in armada-xp.dtsi, compatible overwrites for each SoC, and node >>>> alias usage for each board. Also, ge{0,1} pinctrl settings are moved >>>> to the common node from one board specific node. >>>> >>>> Last 3 patches then use that ge{0,1} pinctrl settings on ix4-300d which >>>> is vital for bootloader init. During exploration of ix4-300d, I also >>>> found a i2c eeprom that has not been added to the dts, yet. Finally, >>>> there is only one 74hc595 on ix4 mainboard while dts property is set >>>> for two. >>>> >>>> I cannot recall in detail what is on that eeprom, but IIRC it is nothing >>>> important. Some reg,addr pairs for some init stuff that should have >>>> already been done by stock u-boot. Anyway, adding the node will do no >>>> harm. >>>> >>>> Patches are based on v3.17-rc1 and intended for v3.18 but I am not in >>>> a hurry. I only compile tested this, so a formal Tested-by from Benoit >>>> for the ix4 and any other Armada XP board would be great. >>> >>> I lost track of this thread, are you resending? Did Benoit get a >>> successful test run? >> >> Looks like there was this A0 stepping thing, but basically yes >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg53364.html >> >> I have just rebased it on top of v3.18-rc1, feel free to pick them >> up from >> >> git://git.infradead.org/users/hesselba/linux-berlin.git devel/mvebu/ix4-300d >> git://git.infradead.org/users/hesselba/linux-berlin.git > > Ahh, that's right. Do you still use the github repo? I hadn't added > your infradead as a remote yet. Usually, I use github for mvebu and infradead for berlin. But this time I was too lazy to either boot-up the other laptop or clone the github repo ;) > At any rate, I cherry-picked them and added Benoit's Tested-by's. So if > you had this branch in -next, please remove it before tonight's run. I _did not_ put it into any -next branch. It's mvebu and that is your git tree, I only put berlin patches into -next ;) > Applied to mvebu/dt. Thanks for having an eye on this patches, I almost forgot about them. Sebastian