From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932100AbaLAPbI (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:31:08 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:60235 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753102AbaLAPbF (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:31:05 -0500 Message-ID: <547C89A4.40002@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:30:44 +0100 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Carpenter CC: OGAWA Hirofumi , Julia Lawall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org, Coccinelle Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs-fat: Less function calls in fat_fill_super() after error detection References: <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <5467B12C.4010602@users.sourceforge.net> <54796B5E.5040707@users.sourceforge.net> <87sih22sn8.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87lhmu2jl8.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <20141201065221.GA4994@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20141201065221.GA4994@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YxclwA7pwhEL7fXbOm3vU7stqpG7mkRLJTEOkMsPg75RC62pCR/ aOJKK6Ax9RTfTqsEfl7RK0D5eoWNeP6UqeSv+hTS/KCwMU+5w82H5ViZlyxMHgkafF+ApUl +laSMlOfNRW+7YYipKNAxbf129zEZHavh4vRZi4NSDISdZC4xkpprGKASnmv27aIuISZXAn bztFgxYjLWbkXgncmvjJg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Mixing the error paths together it always creates confusion. > I fix so many of these bugs... We get a few new ones every week. Would you like to get help here from any other automatic semantic patch approaches? > Meanwhile Markus's error labels are absolutely useless. They give no > indication of what going to the label does. Which names would be better acceptable for you? Regards, Markus