From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751792AbaLCJLl (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 04:11:41 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:63871 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750845AbaLCJLj (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 04:11:39 -0500 Message-ID: <547ED391.1050507@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:10:41 +0100 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Hilman , Russell King , Sekhar Nori , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org CC: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Subject: Re: ARM: DaVinci: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "__clk_disable" References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547EC6B8.6000001@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <547EC6B8.6000001@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ZRW62UWrEgR4QCZ5VC9osnBSaczgVh+8cs9Qp0Zj7OdBTtuL16T R7YDT1iHM7Mgg74QTEbITrSn1w057klHuDOxumPPzDkduZjmlYa6VlogBH0RPfNsvYiSlTX P8DjWLvqfP5owFjJh6vI82/A7fmnn59GdMP7MolaWRXNVvL3uyqQx22Yx1QBK+YtEDZFCqp pavtNihmXfSZd6tQaPBhw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The __clk_disable() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then > returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. I was a bit too quick to send you this notification. I stumbled once more on the detail that my source code analysis approach is incomplete for static functions so far. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm/mach-davinci/clock.c?id=a7ca2bcf2d2ef15c343a12f2a4c2e06380a0f495#n47 https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/clk/clk.c?id=4dc7ed32f398fa76b9e1d243a852420b1dad0150#n846 I would like to apologise for confusion I introduced here. Regards, Markus