From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752543AbaLEIEa (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:04:30 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:63661 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752172AbaLEIE2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:04:28 -0500 Message-ID: <54816700.6090501@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 09:04:16 +0100 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julia Lawall , Joe Perches CC: Sergei Shtylyov , Paul Mackerras , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by pr_warn() in mppe_rekey() References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547C5CBC.6060607@cogentembedded.com> <547C82A6.2030808@users.sourceforge.net> <547CA157.1080401@cogentembedded.com> <5480DA32.8000201@users.sourceforge.net> <5480DBDE.7040604@users.sourceforge.net> <1417731809.2721.17.camel@perches.com> <5480DFB5.4090708@users.sourceforge.net> <1417733101.2721.20.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:cU57L4/WGsmYN9G0YLIEQn5PuLpRnzyabv+O0H+ip8lW4v7nGTN vEQ+9m1i17DvQAXIpTdMOhqBAuTfIfKZ1B7M9mJ4igQcWRPUt/Otw9dzfxF/IjvlkY+ilUU TGF4DVk6AKT90WSby7oop9QYjafZX9mfBF3T/guJyzAcDG9q9lbAZ2YroVXiUP2Q0iq1GCD GL5sr1SG+l+kIdwwLyCSw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Markus, are you sure that you cannot use netdev_warn in this case? No. - I did not become familiar enough with the software infrastructure around the mppe_rekey() function. I do not see so far how I could determine a pointer for the first parameter there. The data structure "ppp_mppe_state" (which is referenced by the input variable "state") does not contain corresponding context information, does it? Regards, Markus