From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753571AbaLEItn (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:49:43 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:54658 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753441AbaLEItl (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:49:41 -0500 Message-ID: <5481719F.4050801@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 09:49:35 +0100 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches CC: Sergei Shtylyov , Paul Mackerras , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by pr_warn() in mppe_rekey() References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547B4886.4080406@users.sourceforge.net> <547B496E.604@users.sourceforge.net> <547C5CBC.6060607@cogentembedded.com> <547C82A6.2030808@users.sourceforge.net> <547CA157.1080401@cogentembedded.com> <5480DA32.8000201@users.sourceforge.net> <5480DBDE.7040604@users.sourceforge.net> <1417731809.2721.17.camel@perches.com> <5480DFB5.4090708@users.sourceforge.net> <1417733101.2721.20.camel@perches.com> <54815C5F.8090702@users.sourceforge.net> <1417766255.2721.43.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <1417766255.2721.43.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:7M+uUubjib4pqwFRnv/idYk7psnbhXjtFCMIU8CfkFhL+KoScH8 J4s/dLcEZk2b9WJMX7d/2uVPcMqJ1LthYUZdguBoSIJSGb88eJIy5tW+uuLNiZskZ1P6LOo E0zpDWFEbBF73/e8/bTcAM754ddrNXE0QbxLgkgP/EWjdS9QCJ9Ui6o6KeJTcP27XcbVyvj 0+SiO5UJmD7+YnK8/8WVw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It's a process, and it's not immediate. Wait to see > if these get applied as-is. Thanks for your constructive feedback. > If the embedded function name use, which is trivial, bothers you, > send another patch later on that changes it. Not really at the moment ... I guess that I would prefer a general development of another semantic patch approach according to your request with the topic "Finding embedded function names?" a moment ago. https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-December/001517.html http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.coccinelle/4399 Regards, Markus