From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751856AbaLEVAi (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 16:00:38 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:50338 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751301AbaLEVAf (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 16:00:35 -0500 Message-ID: <54821CEB.2020002@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:00:27 +0100 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Carpenter CC: Sergei Shtylyov , Paul Mackerras , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] net-PPP: Delete an unnecessary assignment in mppe_alloc() References: <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547B4886.4080406@users.sourceforge.net> <547B496E.604@users.sourceforge.net> <547C5CBC.6060607@cogentembedded.com> <547C82A6.2030808@users.sourceforge.net> <547CA157.1080401@cogentembedded.com> <5480DA32.8000201@users.sourceforge.net> <5480DDC1.6040101@users.sourceforge.net> <20141205122214.GB4912@mwanda> <5481A8AE.9050506@users.sourceforge.net> <20141205135723.GE4912@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20141205135723.GE4912@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gXhpyL6AT9abYR2mVsXttxasCBSigjiHU0YwsGLQSmIad4oruWi xuZqMg2uU6vNTkHdwQ9THcnmaI6GguxJToHZaoS9xfxM1ZrkYnaSnbPaDwg/3904Sr/4QEn SbDJAgYA/GX6aonm0wuchp0zed9IzziIpLLXyGDneU3EG+b+lv9pJQO3aQaZCxQmnwx+67G vb8uYL3x15aCnWJHFYoIg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> That is true. > > In that case, I misunderstood what you wrote. I find it a bit interesting how this misunderstanding could happen here somehow. > Looking at it now, this patch is actually ok. Does that mean that you would like to add any tag like "Acked-by" or "Reviewed-by" to any of the proposed six update steps? Regards, Markus