linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
To: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM64: Add kernel probes(Kprobes) support
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:27:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <548706C6.2050105@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141209133340.GA20265@linaro.org>

On 12/09/14 08:33, Steve Capper wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 08:53:03PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/12/04 20:29), Steve Capper wrote:
>>
>>>> I'd like to ask you to try my fix on your machine, with my reproducing
>>>> methods. (do not use sytemtap nor perf, those can have other issues)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you Masami,
>>>
>>> I tried the following commands:
>>>
>>> echo "p:trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve
>>> trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve" >
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
>>> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable
>>> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_process_exec/enable
>>>
>>> The system appeared okay, I then cat'ed out:
>>> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_profile
>>>     trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve                           25              25
>>>
>>> I got similar output (i.e. no crashes) both with and without the
>>> interrupt fix you recommended.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure how to interpret this, please let me know if you would
>>> like me to run any other tests?
>>>
>>> (I did also try your proposed fix with perf + memcpy and that crashed
>>> in a similar way as before).
>>
>> Hmm, then the bug is still there, and the bug may not be in the recursive
>> call path... We need to find another suspicious code in the patch.
>>
>
> Not sure if this is helpful, but the following also caused a crash for
> me:
>
> echo "p:trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve" > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
> echo "p:memcpy memcpy" >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable
>
> [immediate crash]
>
> The crash point for me is in the arm64 ASID allocator, it again looks
> like the interrupts are in an unexpected state.
> (check_and_switch_context goes down the irqs disabled code path, I
> think incorrectly).
>
> This occurred for me both with and without the proposed irq saving fix.
>
> I will do some more digging.
>

Thanks, more information is good.

-dl



  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-09 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-18  6:32 [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM64: Add kernel probes(Kprobes) support David Long
2014-11-18  6:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
2014-11-18 13:28   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2014-11-21  4:28     ` David Long
2014-11-18 14:38   ` William Cohen
2014-11-18 14:39   ` William Cohen
2014-11-18 14:56   ` Will Deacon
2014-11-19 11:21     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2014-11-19 11:25       ` Will Deacon
2014-11-19 14:55         ` David Long
2014-11-20  5:10           ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2014-11-26  6:46           ` David Long
2014-11-26 10:09             ` Will Deacon
2014-12-22 10:10   ` Pratyush Anand
2014-11-18  6:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: Kprobes instruction simulation support David Long
2014-11-18 14:43   ` William Cohen
2014-11-18  6:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: Add kernel return probes support(kretprobes) David Long
2014-11-18 14:50   ` William Cohen
2014-11-18  6:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module David Long
2014-11-18  6:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
2014-11-18 14:52   ` Will Deacon
2014-11-20  7:20     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-21  6:16     ` David Long
2014-11-20 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM64: Add kernel probes(Kprobes) support Steve Capper
2014-11-26  8:33   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-26 10:03     ` Steve Capper
2014-11-26 17:46       ` David Long
2014-11-26 18:59         ` Steve Capper
2014-11-27  6:07           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-28 16:01             ` Steve Capper
2014-12-01  9:37               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-02 19:27                 ` William Cohen
2014-12-02 20:00                   ` William Cohen
2014-12-03  3:36                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-03 14:54                 ` William Cohen
2014-12-03 22:54                   ` David Long
2014-12-04  0:02                     ` David Long
2014-12-04  1:16                     ` William Cohen
2014-12-04  2:48                       ` David Long
2014-12-04 10:21                         ` Steve Capper
2014-12-04 10:43                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-04 11:29                             ` Steve Capper
2014-12-04 11:53                               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-09 13:33                                 ` Steve Capper
2014-12-09 14:27                                   ` David Long [this message]
2014-12-10 16:38                                     ` Steve Capper
2014-12-12 22:42                                       ` David Long
2014-12-12 23:10                                         ` Steve Capper
2014-12-15  5:58                                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-15  6:29                                           ` David Long
2014-12-05  5:08                       ` William Cohen
2014-11-27  5:13       ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=548706C6.2050105@linaro.org \
    --to=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org \
    --cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
    --cc=tixy@linaro.org \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).