From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1762013AbbA3MoG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:44:06 -0500
Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:52099 "EHLO
	devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755160AbbA3MoE (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:44:04 -0500
Message-ID: <54CB7C5C.9000807@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:43:08 +0200
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
CC: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>, <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
        <sre@debian.org>, <sre@ring0.de>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <tony@atomide.com>, <khilman@kernel.org>,
        <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>, <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>,
        <lars@metafoo.de>, <misael.lopez@ti.com>
Subject: Re: 3.19 on Nokia n900: audio quality awful
References: <20150106170433.GA5408@amd> <20150118120139.GA1509@amd> <54C63F1C.6010703@ti.com> <54C92752.9000004@bitmer.com> <20150128224144.GA28956@amd> <20150129073529.GA19122@bitmer.com> <54CA173F.1070301@ti.com> <20150130102639.GA19595@amd> <20150130103748.GA24623@amd> <54CB7BA6.2070408@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <54CB7BA6.2070408@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 01/30/2015 02:40 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 12:37 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> I looked around the diff between 3.18 and 3.19, reverted these, and
>>> audio quality is back to reasonable level.
>>
>> Actually, reverting 368494093354ac613a80c2e1d77602aa12473cf0 seems
>> enough.
>>
>> Any quick patches to test? Or should we revert so that 3.19-final
>> works ok?
> 
> I'll send the fix in a minute, thanks for finding it ;)

And here it is:
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2015-January/087228.html

-- 
Péter