From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752750AbbBESLf (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:11:35 -0500 Received: from www.sr71.net ([198.145.64.142]:35994 "EHLO blackbird.sr71.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750891AbbBESLe (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:11:34 -0500 Message-ID: <54D3B253.3050000@sr71.net> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 10:11:31 -0800 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Paul McKenney , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-next , LKML , Stephen Rothwell , Kristen Carlson Accardi , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4 References: <20150204193535.58f132c5@canb.auug.org.au> <1511573.AlfExlvQsO@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150204215357.GL5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <11131483.LrRNxJumiL@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150204235115.GP5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150205001019.GA12362@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150205005716.GS5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150205015144.GT5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <54D3186F.7030500@sr71.net> <20150205130343.6ac0eda9@gandalf.local.home> <20150205130802.289a8be0@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150205130802.289a8be0@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/05/2015 10:08 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > --- a/include/trace/events/tlb.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/tlb.h > @@ -13,11 +13,13 @@ > { TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN, "local shootdown" }, \ > { TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN, "local mm shootdown" } > > -TRACE_EVENT(tlb_flush, > +TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(tlb_flush, > > TP_PROTO(int reason, unsigned long pages), > TP_ARGS(reason, pages), > > + TP_CONDITION(cpu_online(smp_processor_id())), That's a pretty reasonable fix, although it would be nice if the debugging was easier to hit. Did I actually need to be onlining/offlining CPUs to hit the splat that Sedat was reporting?