From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754731AbbB0Ihf (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:37:35 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:39596 "EHLO mail-pd0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754069AbbB0Ihc (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:37:32 -0500 Message-ID: <54F02CB6.2090508@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:37:10 +0800 From: Hanjun Guo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Timur Tabi , Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Will Deacon , Olof Johansson , Grant Likely CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , Graeme Gregory , Sudeep Holla , Jon Masters , Marc Zyngier , Mark Brown , Robert Richter , Ashwin Chaugule , suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 References: <1424853601-6675-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <54EFE282.1090305@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <54EFE282.1090305@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Timur, On 2015年02月27日 11:20, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 02/25/2015 02:39 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> Changes since v8: > > I'm still debugging it, but v9 on the 4.0-rc1 kernel crashes after > calling the UEFI boot time services exit function. That is, this line: > > status = sys_table->boottime->exit_boot_services(handle, mmap_key); > > in allocate_new_fdt_and_exit_boot() gets called, and then soon after it > returns, the kernel crashes. It's really early because the UEFI > exception handler is called. > > I did not have this problem with v8 patchset on 3.19. I tested this patch set on FVP base model with UEFI, and booted ok. Can you boot the system without this ACPI patch set? > > > Also, you still have a couple whitespace problems in these patches: > > Applying: ARM64 / ACPI: additions of ACPI documentation for arm64 > /local/mnt/workspace/linux.0/.git/rebase-apply/patch:607: new blank line > at EOF. > + > /local/mnt/workspace/linux.0/.git/rebase-apply/patch:844: new blank line > at EOF. > + > warning: 2 lines add whitespace errors. > Applying: Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 > /local/mnt/workspace/linux.0/.git/rebase-apply/patch:517: new blank line > at EOF. > + > warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors. Weired, When I checked the patch locally there were no whitespace problems: ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0020-Documentation-ACPI-for-ARM64.patch WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? #23: new file mode 100644 WARNING: use relative pathname instead of absolute in changelog text #25: --- /dev/null total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 506 lines checked 0020-Documentation-ACPI-for-ARM64.patch has style problems, please review. ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0021-ARM64-ACPI-additions-of-ACPI-documentation-for-arm64.patch WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? #32: new file mode 100644 WARNING: use relative pathname instead of absolute in changelog text #34: --- /dev/null WARNING: use relative pathname instead of absolute in changelog text #634: --- /dev/null total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 825 lines checked 0021-ARM64-ACPI-additions-of-ACPI-documentation-for-arm64.patch has style problems, please review. Can you provide me the exact line of code which have whitespace problems? Thanks Hanjun