linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Roger C. Pao" <rcpao.enmotus@gmail.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] resource: Add new flag IORESOURCE_MEM_WARN
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:21:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F82E41.9050203@plexistor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F82CE0.4040502@plexistor.com>


memory resource providers set this flag if they want
that request_region will print a warning in dmesg
if this particular memory resource is locked by a driver.

Thous acting as a Protocol Police about experimental
devices that did not pass a committee approval.

The Only user of  this flag is x86/kernel/e820.c that
wants to WARN about UNKNOWN memory types.

NOTE: It would be preferred if I defined a general flag say
      IORESOURCE_WARN, where any kind of resource provider
      can WARN on use, but we have run out of flags in the
      32bit long systems. So I defined a free bit from the
      resource specific flags for mem resources. This is
      why I need to check if this is a memory resource first
      so not to conflict with other resource specific flags.
      (Though actually no one is using this specific bit)

CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
CC: x86@kernel.org
CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/e820.c |  3 +++
 include/linux/ioport.h |  1 +
 kernel/resource.c      | 11 ++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index c3a11cd..c2f2da2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -961,6 +961,9 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources(void)
 
 		res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
 
+		if (_is_unknown_type(e820.map[i].type))
+			res->flags |= IORESOURCE_MEM_WARN;
+
 		/*
 		 * don't register the region that could be conflicted with
 		 * pci device BAR resource and insert them later in
diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
index 2c525022..f78972b 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioport.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct resource {
 #define IORESOURCE_MEM_32BIT		(3<<3)
 #define IORESOURCE_MEM_SHADOWABLE	(1<<5)	/* dup: IORESOURCE_SHADOWABLE */
 #define IORESOURCE_MEM_EXPANSIONROM	(1<<6)
+#define IORESOURCE_MEM_WARN		(1<<7)	/* WARN if requested by driver */
 
 /* PnP I/O specific bits (IORESOURCE_BITS) */
 #define IORESOURCE_IO_16BIT_ADDR	(1<<0)
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 19f2357..f886666 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -1075,8 +1075,17 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent,
 			break;
 		if (conflict != parent) {
 			parent = conflict;
-			if (!(conflict->flags & IORESOURCE_BUSY))
+			if (!(conflict->flags & IORESOURCE_BUSY)) {
+				if ((resource_type(conflict) == IORESOURCE_MEM)
+				    && (conflict->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_WARN)) {
+					add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND,
+						  LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
+					pr_warn("%s requested an unknown memory type [mem %#010llx-%#010llx] %s\n",
+						name, conflict->start,
+						conflict->end, conflict->name);
+				}
 				continue;
+			}
 		}
 		if (conflict->flags & flags & IORESOURCE_MUXED) {
 			add_wait_queue(&muxed_resource_wait, &wait);
-- 
1.9.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-05 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-05 10:16 [PATCH 0/3 v5] e820: Fix handling of NvDIMM chips Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] e820: Don't let unknown DIMM type come out BUSY Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 20:41   ` Dan Williams
2015-03-09 10:54     ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 10:21 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2015-03-05 10:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] e820: Add the unknown-12 Memory type (DDR3-NvDIMM) Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 20:56   ` Dan Williams
2015-03-05 23:09     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-09 12:10       ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-10  5:11         ` joeyli
2015-03-10  8:56           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-10 13:19           ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-09 11:19     ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-09 14:44       ` Dan Williams
2015-03-09 15:14         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-09 15:17           ` Dan Williams
2015-03-10  8:47             ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 10:32 ` [RFC 0/8] pmem: Submission of the Persistent memory block device Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 11:55   ` [PATCH 1/8] pmem: Initial version of persistent memory driver Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 20:35     ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-05 23:03     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-09 12:20       ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-18 18:06         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-26  4:00           ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2015-03-26  7:51             ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-26 21:31             ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-18 17:43     ` Ross Zwisler
2015-03-19  9:24       ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-20  0:11         ` Dan Williams
2015-03-05 11:55   ` [PATCH 2/8] pmem: KISS, remove register_blkdev Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 11:56   ` [PATCH 3/8] pmem: Add support for rw_page() Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 11:57   ` [PATCH 4/8] pmem: Add support for direct_access() Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 11:58   ` [PATCH 5/8] mm: Let sparse_{add,remove}_one_section receive a node_id Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-06 18:43     ` Ross Zwisler
2015-03-05 11:59   ` [PATCH 6/8] mm: New add_persistent_memory/remove_persistent_memory Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 11:59   ` [PATCH 7/8] pmem: Add support for page structs Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-23 20:59     ` Dan Williams
2015-03-05 12:01   ` [PATCH 8/8] OUT-OF-TREE: pmem: Allow request_mem to fail (BLK_DEV_PMEM_IGNORE_REQUEST_MEM_RET) Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-06 18:37   ` [RFC 0/8] pmem: Submission of the Persistent memory block device Ross Zwisler
2015-03-07  1:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-03-09 12:41     ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-05 22:48 ` [PATCH 0/3 v5] e820: Fix handling of NvDIMM chips H. Peter Anvin
2015-03-05 23:06   ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54F82E41.9050203@plexistor.com \
    --to=boaz@plexistor.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rcpao.enmotus@gmail.com \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).