linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] x86/mm/tlb: Remove UV special case
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 19:25:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54c082c5-ebee-8fd7-cf69-b8c15b60a329@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190719005837.4150-9-namit@vmware.com>

It is a fact that the UV is still the UV and SGI is now part of HPE. 
The current external product is known as SuperDome Flex.  It is both up 
to date as well as very well maintained.  The ACK I provided was an okay 
to change the code, but please make the description accurate.

On 7/18/2019 5:58 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> SGI UV support is outdated and not maintained, and it is not clear how
> it performs relatively to non-UV. Remove the code to simplify the code.
> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 25 -------------------------
>   1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> index 89f83ad19507..40daad52ec7d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> @@ -684,31 +684,6 @@ void native_flush_tlb_multi(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
>   		trace_tlb_flush(TLB_REMOTE_SEND_IPI,
>   				(info->end - info->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>   
> -	if (is_uv_system()) {
> -		/*
> -		 * This whole special case is confused.  UV has a "Broadcast
> -		 * Assist Unit", which seems to be a fancy way to send IPIs.
> -		 * Back when x86 used an explicit TLB flush IPI, UV was
> -		 * optimized to use its own mechanism.  These days, x86 uses
> -		 * smp_call_function_many(), but UV still uses a manual IPI,
> -		 * and that IPI's action is out of date -- it does a manual
> -		 * flush instead of calling flush_tlb_func_remote().  This
> -		 * means that the percpu tlb_gen variables won't be updated
> -		 * and we'll do pointless flushes on future context switches.
> -		 *
> -		 * Rather than hooking native_flush_tlb_multi() here, I think
> -		 * that UV should be updated so that smp_call_function_many(),
> -		 * etc, are optimal on UV.
> -		 */
> -		flush_tlb_func_local((void *)info);
> -
> -		cpumask = uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
> -		if (cpumask)
> -			smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
> -					       (void *)info, 1);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>   	/*
>   	 * If no page tables were freed, we can skip sending IPIs to
>   	 * CPUs in lazy TLB mode. They will flush the CPU themselves
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-19  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-19  0:58 [PATCH v3 0/9] x86: Concurrent TLB flushes Nadav Amit
2019-07-19  0:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] smp: Run functions concurrently in smp_call_function_many() Nadav Amit
2019-07-19 18:23   ` Dave Hansen
2019-07-22 18:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 18:41       ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-22 19:34         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 18:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 18:34     ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-22 19:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 18:37     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-22 18:40       ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-22 18:51         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-22 19:02           ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-25 12:36             ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-25 19:10               ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-19  0:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] x86/mm/tlb: Remove reason as argument for flush_tlb_func_local() Nadav Amit
2019-07-19  0:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] x86/mm/tlb: Open-code on_each_cpu_cond_mask() for tlb_is_not_lazy() Nadav Amit
2019-07-19 18:36   ` Dave Hansen
2019-07-19 18:41     ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-19 22:44       ` Joe Perches
2019-07-19 23:02         ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-22 18:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 19:47   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-07-22 19:51     ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-19  0:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently Nadav Amit
2019-07-22 19:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 19:27     ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-22 19:32       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-26  7:28   ` Juergen Gross
2019-07-31  0:13   ` Michael Kelley
2019-07-19  0:58 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] x86/mm/tlb: Privatize cpu_tlbstate Nadav Amit
2019-07-19 18:38   ` Dave Hansen
2019-07-19 18:43     ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-19 18:48       ` Dave Hansen
2019-07-19 18:54         ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-20 13:58           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-21 20:21     ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-19  0:58 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] x86/mm/tlb: Do not make is_lazy dirty for no reason Nadav Amit
2019-07-19  0:58 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] cpumask: Mark functions as pure Nadav Amit
2019-07-19  0:58 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] x86/mm/tlb: Remove UV special case Nadav Amit
2019-07-19  2:25   ` Mike Travis [this message]
2019-07-19  4:58     ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-31  3:11     ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-19  0:58 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] x86/mm/tlb: Remove unnecessary uses of the inline keyword Nadav Amit
2019-07-19 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] x86: Concurrent TLB flushes Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54c082c5-ebee-8fd7-cf69-b8c15b60a329@hpe.com \
    --to=mike.travis@hpe.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).