From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755053AbbCROv6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:51:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37571 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754857AbbCROvy (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:51:54 -0400 Message-ID: <55098F3B.7070000@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:44:11 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton CC: Al Viro , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Neil Brown , Tetsuo Handa , Sage Weil , Mark Fasheh , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Use GFP_KERNEL allocation for the page cache in page_cache_read References: <1426687766-518-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <1426687766-518-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/18/2015 10:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > page_cache_read has been historically using page_cache_alloc_cold to > allocate a new page. This means that mapping_gfp_mask is used as the > base for the gfp_mask. Many filesystems are setting this mask to > GFP_NOFS to prevent from fs recursion issues. page_cache_read is, > however, not called from the fs layer Is that true for filesystems that have directories in the page cache?