From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752377AbbDCPir (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2015 11:38:47 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:51829 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751497AbbDCPiq (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2015 11:38:46 -0400 Message-ID: <551EB403.9030607@free-electrons.com> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 17:38:43 +0200 From: Gregory CLEMENT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Cooper CC: Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Ezequiel Garcia , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Maxime Ripard , Boris BREZILLON , Lior Amsalem , Tawfik Bayouk , Nadav Haklai Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] irqchip: armada-370-xp: Allow using wakeup source References: <1427724278-12379-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1427724278-12379-5-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <20150402232316.GJ24598@io.lakedaemon.net> <551E3EA3.8010409@free-electrons.com> <20150403142922.GL24598@io.lakedaemon.net> In-Reply-To: <20150403142922.GL24598@io.lakedaemon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/04/2015 16:29, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >> Hi Jason, >> >> On 03/04/2015 01:23, Jason Cooper wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:04:37PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>>> On the Armada 370/XP SoCs, in standby mode the SoC stay powered and it >>>> is possible to wake-up from any interrupt sources. This patch adds >>>> flag to the MPIC irqchip driver to let linux know this. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT >>>> --- >>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> Applied to irqchip/mvebu >> >> Thanks! >> >> Do you agree to take also the patch 3? > > hmmm... > >> It modifies a file in mach-mvebu (board-v7.c) but it depends on a patch >> located in irqchip: "irqchip: gic: Add an entry point to set up irqchip flags" > > Yeah, I saw that. Do you forsee any merge conflicts with mvebu? The reason I There is only two patches which modify the same file, but they don't touch the same chunk. So the only impact would be the line numbers which could not be different. In order to be sure I've just tried to apply first this patch and then these 2 other ones: there was no problem at all. > ask is that it looks like I'm going to be sending directly to Linus this > cycle. I'd really prefer to hold off a cycle on that patch. I'm not > 100% certain my second PR (stacked domain/DT break) is going to get > accepted. Which is what this patch depends on. > > thoughts? This patch can wait if needed as this patch alone is not enough to to be able to use standby and I am not sure at all that I the other part of the series will be merged in 4.1. Thanks, Gregory -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com