From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755273AbbDIOez (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:34:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:38872 "EHLO mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751445AbbDIOew (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:34:52 -0400 Message-ID: <55268DCB.3010201@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 16:33:47 +0200 From: Quentin Lambert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Carpenter CC: "David S. Miller" , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide: replace GFP_ATOMIC by GFP_KERNEL References: <1428579988-10167-1-git-send-email-lambert.quentin@gmail.com> <1428579988-10167-3-git-send-email-lambert.quentin@gmail.com> <20150409123633.GN10964@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20150409123633.GN10964@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/04/2015 14:36, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Oh. They're not GFP_ATOMIC. > > Fold these two patches together into one patch and resend. The reason I did it that way is because I feel that the two patches really are different. The first one do not change the execution of the code but the second one does. Could you explain to me why they can be folded into one ? regards, Quentin