From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755471AbbDNPkF (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:05 -0400 Received: from mail-db3on0064.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.234.64]:21888 "EHLO emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753701AbbDNPjz (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:39:55 -0400 Authentication-Results: infradead.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; Message-ID: <552D34BC.4060109@ezchip.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:39:40 -0400 From: Chris Metcalf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Weisbecker CC: Thomas Gleixner , Don Zickus , , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] smpboot: allow excluding cpus from the smpboot threads References: <1428611341-27563-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com> <20150410015842.GG18314@lerouge> <5527FB62.1010209@ezchip.com> <20150412191403.GB23757@lerouge> <552BE99A.1050607@ezchip.com> <20150414152357.GA1781@lerouge> In-Reply-To: <20150414152357.GA1781@lerouge> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [12.216.194.146] X-ClientProxiedBy: BY2PR04CA0080.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.255.247.48) To DB5PR02MB0776.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.161.243.147) X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB5PR02MB0776; X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: BMV:1;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6049001)(6009001)(479174004)(24454002)(377454003)(110136001)(4001350100001)(80316001)(86362001)(54356999)(92566002)(65956001)(83506001)(15975445007)(64126003)(59896002)(42186005)(76176999)(47776003)(50986999)(62966003)(1411001)(87266999)(19580395003)(77156002)(23746002)(65816999)(40100003)(46102003)(93886004)(66066001)(36756003)(65806001)(50466002)(77096005)(122386002)(2950100001)(33656002)(18886065003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:DB5PR02MB0776;H:[10.7.0.41];FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010);SRVR:DB5PR02MB0776;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB5PR02MB0776; X-Forefront-PRVS: 054642504A X-OriginatorOrg: ezchip.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Apr 2015 15:39:52.1184 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5PR02MB0776 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/14/2015 11:23 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:06:50PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: >> Also, I want to ask Linus to pull the tile-specific changes for nohz_full >> for the tile architecture. This includes a copy of the change to add the >> tick_nohz_full_add_cpus_to() and tick_nohz_full_remove_cpus_from() >> routines here: > Hmm, this is going to be too late to push the tick_nohz_full_add_cpus_to() > stuff for this merge window. This needs to go through nohz core tree and > we are already in the middle of the merge window. I'll defer the change in the tilegx network driver until the next merge. (I guess what I would do is cherrypick the nohz change into the tile tree to keep it easy to build and just assume it's easy to resolve when it's pulled for 4.2.) -- Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor http://www.ezchip.com