From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757667AbbDVTeG (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:34:06 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:53072 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756714AbbDVTeD (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:34:03 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,625,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="717650262" Message-ID: <5537F7AA.3010609@intel.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:34:02 -0700 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Yu, Fenghua" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "Mallick, Asit K" , "Williamson, Glenn P" CC: linux-kernel , x86 Subject: Re: [PATCH Bugfix v2 2/4] x86/xsaves: Define and use user_xstate_size for xstate size in signal context References: <1429678319-61356-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <1429678319-61356-3-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <5537EC31.7080808@intel.com> <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C712205C8CE779@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C712205C8CE779@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/22/2015 12:05 PM, Yu, Fenghua wrote: >> From: Hansen, Dave >> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:45 AM >> To: Yu, Fenghua; H. Peter Anvin; Ingo Molnar; Thomas Gleixner; Mallick, Asit >> K; Williamson, Glenn P >> Cc: linux-kernel; x86 >> Subject: Re: [PATCH Bugfix v2 2/4] x86/xsaves: Define and use >> user_xstate_size for xstate size in signal context >> >> On 04/21/2015 09:51 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote: >>> + /* >>> + * Copy rest of xstates in compact format to user. >>> + */ >>> + for (i = 2; i < xstate_features; i++) { >>> + if (test_bit(i, (unsigned long *)&pcntxt_mask)) { >>> + int user_offset, kernel_offset; >>> + int size; >>> + >>> + user_offset = xstate_offsets[i]; >>> + kernel_offset = xstate_comp_offsets[i]; >>> + size = xstate_sizes[i]; >>> + >>> + if (__copy_to_user(buf_fx + user_offset, >>> + xsave + kernel_offset, size)) >>> + return -1; >>> + } >>> + } >> >> Is this checking the right bitmap? >> >> The 'xsaves' documentation says: "If RFBM[i] = 1, XSTATE_BV[i] is set to the >> value of XINUSE[i]". Where "XINUSE denotes the state-component bitmap >> corresponding to the init optimization". >> >> So shouldn't this be checking xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv instead of >> pcntxt_mask? The will be equal unless the "init optimization" is in play. > > Xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv is equal to pcntxt_mask (see setup_init_fpu_buf()). No. I don't think it works this way. xsaves *WRITES* to the XSTATE_BV[] field in addition to reading it. According to the SDM: "execution of XSAVES writes the XSTATE_BV field of the XSAVE header (see Section 13.4.2), setting XSTATE_BV[i] (0 ≤ i ≤ 63) as follows... Execution of XSAVES performs the init optimization to reduce the amount of data written to memory. If XINUSE[i] = 0, state component i is not saved to the XSAVE area (even if RFBM[i] = 1)". > And here XINUSE and RFBM are irrelevant because they are used in init or modified > optimization during xsave*/xrstore*. We only copy out the xstates from kernel > to user and XINUSE and RFBM are not in scope here. I think they are in use. The kernel created its buffer with 'xsaves' so when it is reading the buffer it needs to take those optimizations in to consideration.