From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"al.stone@linaro.org" <al.stone@linaro.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"leo.duran@amd.com" <leo.duran@amd.com>,
"msalter@redhat.com" <msalter@redhat.com>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: ACPI: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:14:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554238D3.7050806@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150430135018.GH32373@arm.com>
On 2015年04月30日 21:50, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015年04月29日 22:42, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:31:03AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>> On 04/29/2015 09:04 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:44:08AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>>> Any plans for ACPI on 32-bit ARM?
>>>>
>>>> Not that I am aware, but I could be totally wrong. The reason I am adding
>>>> this here for 32-bit ARM is because the ACPI spec mentioned this.
>>>>
>>>> If you think this is not necessary until we introduce ACPI for ARM32, it can
>>>> be removed.
>>>
>>> I think it should be removed (as long as ACPI cannot be selected on
>>> arm32).
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> Now there is no plan for ARM32 ACPI as I know, ACPI for ARM targets
>> for ARM64 based enterprise system at now.
>
> While we're at it, do we *really* need to support CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
> on arm64? It's a deprecated /proc/acpi interface and it would be nice to
> avoid introducing deprecated behaviour if we can avoid it.
I agree. It is used for laptop ac adapter and battery, I will look
into that and clean it up for ARM64.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-29 13:44 [PATCH 0/2] ACPI : Introduce support for _CCA object Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 13:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: ACPI: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-04-29 14:31 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-04-29 14:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-30 13:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-04-30 13:50 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 14:14 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-04-30 15:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-04-29 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 14:45 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:47 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 14:57 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2015-04-29 15:39 ` Al Stone
2015-04-29 16:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-01 11:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-08 14:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-11 17:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-11 17:24 ` Robin Murphy
2015-04-29 16:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 21:53 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-30 8:23 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 10:41 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 10:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 11:07 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 11:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 11:46 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 13:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 13:13 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 15:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-08 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 23:39 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554238D3.7050806@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.duran@amd.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).