From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752558AbbD3OtB (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:49:01 -0400
Received: from smtp106.biz.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([98.139.244.54]:37266 "EHLO
	smtp106.biz.mail.bf1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751547AbbD3Os6 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:48:58 -0400
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: 1hTJVegVM1nCl0Hw3VbDhQuhEieviPuiE4jFjlqyyHSfPLk
 dMo8Dd.QVcefoItteP91IaOMtEArvrDHZJNgz3fOYiJvQrztaJ3X9SMxosCe
 DdRuf95CjrvdC.DHL0JKPX5anoG7tBb_tyg1TxwLTyrjzTcX.c8uwns9jdZW
 Q6LICdst7Mts1nv_jgisfLPKJG.PI7Dy9mc2PDQFd_O5W30gbmJDOq4UBsx9
 SZxod5fPYsYe7F0kk15pEztkhxZSHP2zrNoBfvWfD8s8UR6VfixO20Ub_sGL
 c68_gK6sPDQI9nT8qXYeSjMcETKQG2pnpZIf3f4MrAJKkCKZa9ILS3s19mRG
 2f0gFYE9F5yafzi.a05fv5qM58JvfMOaOciWtR9EexYPb1rPOtWQ6Gc1oUB3
 j2LIf11XGZp2O779nTZ.69X9_TWajNQVkodvgWCsvwkO_aHcqjhDEyDLxrvG
 HpKvdliswV7mO4VX0xLBWasup99KAtKs4gq6R2Kir9uFoAzWJ6JlLCr0e6fk
 7tMan8CtlveeibJgtARrSqpzxASK1fPiNj.LoYRnqGw--
X-Yahoo-SMTP: OIJXglSswBDfgLtXluJ6wiAYv6_cnw--
Message-ID: <554240D9.506@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:48:57 -0700
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
CC: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>, Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: Module stacking next steps
References: <5536F260.3080201@schaufler-ca.com> <alpine.LRH.2.11.1504301138120.10370@namei.org> <55419737.4000907@canonical.com> <alpine.LRH.2.11.1504302119510.19912@namei.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.11.1504302119510.19912@namei.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 4/30/2015 4:20 AM, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, John Johansen wrote:
>
>> On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>>
>>>> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
>>>> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
>>>> procedure would you like to follow?
>>> What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as 
>>> useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in?
>>>
>>> Any objections or concerns?
>>>
>> No objections, and I know there are several people interested in seeing
>> this land.
>>
>> I am happy with the code, and my only concerns lie with things that this
>> explicitly doesn't support yet (ie. larger lsm stacking, secids, ...)
> Ok, Casey, please send an updated final version for everyone to check.

Are you planning to update security-next soon? I think that it will
be easier for everyone if I base it on the 4.1-rc than the 4.0-rc.
Alternatively, I could base it on 4.0. I can do any of 'em, but I'd
hate to have to do it more often than I have to.